I probably cannot reassure anyone unless I am held responsible for my own life and the particulars of it. I know that when Staff talks to me, they ask me to take responsibility for my life and not worry about other people in the community. During a certain time in my life I did think that my history was subject to difficulties, that I might not be the best person in regards to that authority. Though this time came to pass, I made it a policy to not hold a person responsible for the transgressions of another. This was just a policy. Had I not made that special consideration, I would have been drawn into various circumstances not having much at all to do with me or my history. We would be obligated to indict a person for a possibility that would never solve. I therefore want very much to point out that people have lots of social contact in various combinations, that no accident of the body is the responsibility of another.
There is another little technicality involving the volition (pronounced Vol-ishon) of a person who might also have a popular opinion. When in the course of the predications and directives of such great persons, there is always the danger that it has a self defeating cause. Would you continue to work on that basis? Well, yes. To do the work is good; we already know. Since the thinking is deployed rather suspiciously in that there are major ideas being said in no uncertain terms, I want to mention that we have learned this particular convention from the lessons of history. We do not question those with a stronger mind than ourselves since we might not have the endowment for as many diverse ideas.
To get that into one’s knowledge, “Those space invaders have a good effect.” If we were in the time of King Tut, would we have such an ethic? They did not think that certain “space invaders” should live on that basis. I happen to believe that all people have privileges and immunities given to them by the 14th Amendment, but in that time they did not have a government to direct their society. Shall we use conditioning to sort of weed out those parts of our society that bridge the, “mind your own business.” ethic, and then later legislate the rule of law on those whose minds carry with them that established and popular opinion? Keep in mind that we want those kinds of people in our society to be FREE and we want them to practice our traditions.
I just think that these ideas are far too advanced for my purpose: to render the possibility of the body to to itself. The later thoughts are applicable to this topic, however they are grossly undeveloped. I just need to establish that making a controversy out of an event would be a travesty to the possibility as a general idea.
There are a lot of stopping points in this discussion. But, these very important ideas have been passed over. That there are major topics mentioned, and I should refer to the text Judgment of Pharaoh; I believe the stuff in need of respectful attention is the Phenomenology.
45 PERCENT 