Category: Artist

Comments to XVR

There is some question as to just what is the XVR page.  Some visitors are wondering about the situation.  I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral.  So, let us take a survey of the situation.

First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed.  That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications.  Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature.  That should be a Huzza for Hume!!

Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty.  And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being.  Familiar? Yes.  Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology.  At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine.  I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY.  So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion.  And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome.  A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.

From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character.  I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy.  I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time.  He refused his award.  I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance.  Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne.  And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious.  Is it a “Pay Stub?”

The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers.  I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone.  I am not going to worry about it.  I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.

Phenomenology

I am going to discuss my personal views about someone who is very important to me; Merleau-Ponty.  From my first recollection, I did not like Ponty. The fact is those feelings guaranteed me an automatic ‘F’.  I can tell that I have made progress in my opinion since – as evidence by my erasure of comments in the margins of his greatest work: Eye and Mind.

So I cleaned up my copy of his essay. Merleau-Ponty who was a French Philosopher wrote about the Master French painter Cezanne.  After Ponty passed away in the early sixties, his works were translated into English.  The translator, Carleton Dallery used a number of writing styles to achieve an effective and purposeful study for the English speaking scholar to learn about Cezanne.  The consequences for my strong feelings against Merleau-Ponty at that first reading are not outside of the realm of possibilities for any reader.  It might be the case that Carleton Dallery at the expense of being perceived as not knowing a certain detail about Cezanne, embedded a critical idea which does not come to fruition in order to affect the reader with strong feelings.  Not however, but particularly for Ponty, space has taken on a kind of identity.  I have had difficulty overcoming my initial opinion and further hold by some fault of my own I have come up short on wits.  Thus I must reason I had at that time the condition about which I have already talked about a necessity for agreement.  This is in keeping with my latter readings, and I want to reassure Dick Tracy that I like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and that I understand his essay; I admit it is a great work.

You are a fool! So, you say you like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, but you have changed. Why you don’t convict him for your disposition?

Well, I will tell you, my friend, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s English translation has as a remedy something called a Rhinoplasty. This is a Plastic Surgery correcting the Septum from deviation. These were his last words, ‘you have your whole life ahead of you.’ I got a Rhinoplasty. It has been the single most enlightening procedure of my Life.

If you are able to sustain a frame of mind on that of a person whose fingers are stubby, you will learn. There are a number of builds that are available to muse with; all of which raises your social status. I am telling you this because there is a reason that a Dominant Gene results in a Conscience. The Dominant Genes of this particular type in a person who has one from each parent, results in a disorder, called Phocomelia, and which causes a birth defect of the arms and hands. Phocomelia literally means Flippers. The genetic disposition, I am calling a Disorder, includes the making of the Conscience where there is only one Dominant Gene of which it is the same type. Here the Idea is that you get your genes from your parents. This is a normal condition to have one, or to have both Recessive. The infamous Luke Sky-walker was Recessive-Recessive; “Use the Force Luke”. And this very issue which sadly Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not correctly develop for some reason, is a Distinguishing component of socialization.

When the Philosopher says existentially NO!; it is to be a distinguishing threshold in which we enlightened the path to Fame. For example you would not want a person with a conscience to read the news or write lyrics for an album unless the person were able to overcome the present with new material. What you have said about my acceptance of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is probably a thought disorder.

To make this situation which I have built in thought whole, I just want to mention that there is another reading of David Hume. His thoughts mostly have been about the good of determination. But if you needed an advocate for your applied distinguishing activity, which I have said is Genetic, Hume has the correct thinking for a free minded person of a general nature to be an advocate. So, on the basis that this issue is Genetic, I conclude that there will be NO changes in the thinking process – no fear. I say this and I expect you to believe that you are who you are ever since conception. Now, haven’t I been a nuisance, a person should not have Fear? And haven’t I just given you a good reason to teach Hume even though his works only seem to fit with a certain type of a person?

If for some reason, the little friendship that Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre had while the editors of the magazine in France the prejudice against Maurice Merleau-Ponty still went without address, his reason is there really is something to see: and I am referring to Phenomenology. Maurice Merleau-Ponty would have been the president of that little organization of Cosmonauts.

Now, I have a little bit of house keeping to do for Maurice Merleau-Ponty that I haven’t addressed elsewhere. While Maurice Merleau-Ponty had a driver which never came to fruition. I have mentioned it earlier, there is a confusion about which gene he is referring to. Let me say that when I was referring to a Dominant Gene, it is conceivable the inherited dominant gene for conscience could have come from either parent and not just the Father. Though he did not speak of it, he was all the while referring to another Gene; it was a driver to get a person to have strong feelings. In the Philosophical work Eye and Mind, which he is best known for and which he sort of built a little engine “see,” Maurice Merleau-Ponty, though I do not believe it today, there is a tendency to confuse the gene for sex with the gene for conscience.  Recall that Maurice Merleau-Ponty mostly ignored the prompting from Sartre about the Genetic issue. So, when the prejudicial perspective that Sartre would have prompted him about in their years together came up, Maurice Merleau-Ponty probably extended his most highest held belief, to see, in the instance that it is restricted to that of the spirit of the Father. In the case of the Fathers Gene, the Genetic issue is in regards to the twenty-third Chromosome determining a person’s sex. In a remedy, from the religious point of view involving the Holy Trinity, after thoughts (God willing), the Father could have a high degree of influence over his children’s cognitive abilities. Here I want to mention that this is as much a disparity as that of the twenty-second Chromosome which determines conscience. So, even though I have been square about a Distinguishing social issue, the presiding gene, I have had to bring into the discussion a matter of articulation of Maurice Merleau-Pontys emphasis as having a gene that could inconceivably been inherited from the Mother as well as from the Father. It is the Holy Trinity case the Philosopher Spinoza had as a good Catholic. Maurice Merleau-Ponty merely cast into time for a collection of intelligent substance with which seeing would be the basis of a Phenomenology without the context involving the gene for sexual orientation.

I seem to have uncovered a matter of confusion.  If you wish to think about this issue look at XVR and Comments to XVR

Madonna I’m “TEV2”

I want to know a little more about Madonna. Confessions is really great. I would never say that about anyone unless I thought they were equipped to process it. Admittedly though I do not think I could differentiate a Paranoid person from the Performer. It would help a lot if I could tell what I am [a boy / a girl]; I am TEV2. The last few times I took a 48D; which with the given in-site, is passing at that, I discovered I’m right where I’m at! Did she go somewhere else? Hell no. From the repertoire of things I am able to do, that they are not a public spectacle, I can only hope that they would be appropriate; but that I am acting on the basis that I believe what I am doing is in fact in agreement with the Truth of what I am doing. Basically, don’t go somewhere else. The thoughts should be accepted on the basis of their merits; sometimes it’s itself.

Madonna has correct thinking! So just how is Madonna doing? Madonna’s web site is pretty good.  I was reminded of the type (real clean) with none of the “euroMA” high end negatives that come with the Madonna territory. I have been won. She really has all her stuff tuned up. “Hello? Madonna? I want to sign your guest book. First though, could we see where we’re at with Max Allen Collins?”

If it were not for the name as his talent, he never would have flipped Dick Tracy over, run him ragged through various instances of Cezanne, and twisted him until we should accept the compromising psychiatric circumstance of, “she should have made it easier for him to forgive,” he would have got this stuff long ago. But he is his name, and he still hides behind it. Did Max Allen Collins ever do any moonlighting? As usual, people work.  The worse the tweaking, the harder it is on the people who work. The essentials though we have to work once straightened out makes it a lot easier for us.  I mean we won’t have to work quite as hard.

Getting back to the person I want to talk about. I say; yeah. yea; it is the name thing, and Madonna has the thinking; I can hear it. Everything is in the best of all possible places. So, anyway, Max is the guy who hangs there just because he can tell there are similarities; like agreement. To get this you would have to have studied for years on the Chester Gould’s Dick Tracy. You would have had to realize that Devitt is a good name given similar circumstances. I will tell you that it will come up at the right time; and you will have the correct thinking too.  And with the correct thinking; it is just the most amazing, “would be song.” Since when is a name bad on the basis that it is mean!

God where did my childhood go? No, No, I am responsible; I am no ‘nvu’. I have been in Roe v. Wade a while during my childhood. So, that is about the sum total of it; Right? I guess I matured enough not to be in danger of getting chosen. The rule is 1.2.3. Candidly, I would have been a lot better off if I had been Catholic. Even The Catholic Project Rachel has correct thinking.  Project Rachel is the Catholic version of Roe V. Wade.  That’s amazing to me!

Especially noteworthy since I’m on the topic, I am not flip-flopping either. Madonna? pick up.  I just want to give credit where credit is due. This is not an invitation either, and I am betting that if I never get a response from Madonna, confessions is enough.  Beyond that, which people often try; this is “TEV2.” And so I am a boy and I have everything.  If nothing else this reading has been in-creditable.

While great songs are written and the few Rock Stars have become the Many Stars, I could only reward myself by giving my dad an award.

Cezanne’s Centennial 2006

Get ready! I have to acknowledge this year is the Centennial (100 years) Anniversary of Paul Cezanne’s death.  He was born on January 19, 1839 and passed away October 22, 1906.  He was a very great artist, and there is no shortage of information about him as a man.  There is a lesson which I have learned from years of study about him.  I think about Cézanne every single day of my life.  I live in a region that is an equivalent in climate to France.  The fact that he suffered psychiatrically is predicative in the many descriptions of his Masterful Paintings.

I am happy I do not have the illness he had. There is a great deal of support structures in our American culture to be sure Cezanne was the last famous person to suffer his own thinking in a certain way. In the United States he would be considered to have Schizophrenia.

My particular situation in my youth caused me to get angry without even knowing what I was trying to prevent.  I fought through most of my childhood, and it turns out the issue is about my name and not my situation.  I should do something for fear a person might suffer as he did.

The community I live in has largely been critical of my position on Cézanne, however this temperament is local. If you find yourself interested in Cezanne there really is an Idea; not just a patina or a mold. And, the bottom line categorically is that I’ve learned something about Genes. Those are pretty much set; so, don’t expect any changes in your Genetic make-up.

Cezanne’s Anniversary

Vincent’s Red Vineyard

redvinyard

This picture appeared in ARN’s Blogspot, an image from an Art Book.  I gave a lot of citation info.  It is a Vincent van Gogh. It was originally purchased by Eugene Boch, The Red Vineyard; one of the only paintings that van Gogh sold.  It was painted in November 1888.  Though at the Pushkin Museum in Moscow, it was rumored for sale to the US.  It’s called the Red Vineyard; I believe it has recently been acquired.  I have some enthusiasm.  Hundred