Embassy Suites Hotel – Walnut Creek

I am making this post out to the Embassy Suites Hotel in Walnut Creek California. These links below originated in a blog called ARNF3tracy. The presentation is still intact and is here for you now at Gevluef.

I consulted for the Hilton Hotel Corporation for a week. The presentation for Embassy Suites Hotel is in this blog and the links are in this post. The dates of the presentation were written from February 17 through February 23. This is the Presentation Summary:

  1. Embassy Suites Hotel Probate Bond [C/o Embassy Suites Hotel]
  2. Jennifer vs. Natalie
  3. Follicle
  4. Thomas Hobbes
  5. Specific points in Diplomacy
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Wall
  8. Hotel Bible

If you wish you may read the presentation. There is also a Book about Hospitality: Solomon, Micah; The Heart of Hospitality, 2016.

Thomas Hobbes

There is something I’ve been thinking about. At my board and care there is almost sixty people. We share common areas; such as Dinning, Medication, T.V., and Patio. There are lots of opportunities to interact and socialize. We do have a person here with Hepatitis C. And we also have a couple of people with Diabetes. I have been looking for an authority on this subject, because I have a developing opinion that there may be an interaction of some kind; namely Creativity. I will be reading the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes in his Book, Leviathan. ed. JCA Gaskin. Oxford, 1998.

Since I have directly said what I will be reading for, I think it is only fair to reassure the reader that I have had a comprehensive blood test on February 4, 2008. My Hepatitis Panel was NON-REACTIVE; the Glucose was 91 in range (65-99 mg/dL). There are other details, but I just wanted to mention that I probably have not contracted any blood diseases in this past year. If you are an employee of McDonalds Corporation, I sincerely believe that this kind of blood testing is periodically necessary as part of the job. Remember that we have come a long way since 1651.

Follicle

From Arles, Vincent van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo: “I am seeing a lot of new things here. I am learning, and my body, if treated with a little kindness, serves me well.”

Theo was probably expected to have some knowledge. As an artist, Vincent toiled amongst his paintings. Elaborate charges against Vincent are all that is expected from Theo. And so…

The basic assumption is that a difficult Question has been asked.
You are struggling with one of the most important of humanities. Unfortunately nowhere in Philosophy or Religion can this be learned since there is no place willing or accommodating. If someone failed to convince you they know what you are asking, would you impose on them your answer? I should not have commented, or else I must forgive a person whose transgressions have advanced and whose answer is possible. This is not my discussion because I have not asked the questions. After careful meditation, I have concluded, particularly, that there is some solution a Prior to this possibility.

Then should we thus maintain those whose transgressions must be forgiven as the rank-n-file for an answer, or should we have them as steady but nourishing components of the way?

Vincent van Gogh
Arles, June 1888
Oil on Canvas, 73 x 92.5 cm
F 425, JH 1442
Otterlo, Rijksmuseum Kroller-Muller.

Image Citation:
Walther, Ingo, and Rainer Metzger. Vincent van Gogh: The Complete Paintings, Volume II. Trans. Michael Hulse. Oldenburg, Germany: Benedikt Taschen, 1990.