Cezanne’s Centennial 2006

Get ready! I have to acknowledge this year is the Centennial (100 years) Anniversary of Paul Cezanne’s death. He was born on January 19, 1839 and passed away October 22, 1906. He was a very great artist, and there is no shortage of information about him as a man. There is a lesson which I have learned from years of study about him. I think about Cézanne every single day of my life. I live in a region that is an equivalent in climate to France. The fact that he suffered psychiatrically is predicative in the many descriptions of his Masterful Paintings.

I am happy I do not have the illness he had. There is a great deal of support structures in our American culture to be sure Cezanne was the last famous person to suffer his own thinking in a certain way. In the United States he would be considered to have Schizophrenia.

My particular situation in my youth caused me to get angry without even knowing what I was trying to prevent. I fought through most of my childhood, and it turns out the issue is about my name and not my situation. I should do something for fear a person might suffer as he did.

The community I live in has largely been critical of my position on Cézanne, however this temperament is local. If you find yourself interested in Cezanne there really is an Idea; not just a patina or a mold. And, the bottom line categorically is that I’ve learned something about Genes. Those are pretty much set; so, don’t expect any changes in your Genetic make-up.

Cezanne’s Anniversary

We’re Getting Along

I am fascinated by the Japan and China exchange.

If I had to choose between the two I would choose China. But I am just being honest about my history. Just a little more about that; I am willing to admit that Sony is a bad name as is my family name on my mother’s side: Polson. Basically the problems these two countries are going through are based on circumstances that could be explained easily just knowing that.

Yet I get just underneath the surface, and I can understand the political issues. Koizumi, who is I guess ending his political position is somewhat bitter about having not had any sons. His claim is that China has enjoyed the benefits of its culture, a rather assertive feminist disposition. I am like what? There are women in practically every facet of my life. I learned about women’s issues. Should I be defensive about my own conscience of this imbalance? I say imbalance only to the extent that I know my best ability in contrast to myself knowledge; I leave and I am good. Assuming I am leaving as predicated by my own personal substance such as a social function, the facts about me such as my self knowledge, I also expect my constituency to also have knowledge. But, to leave similarly; I do not think I would have any gain from that proceeding. It is almost as if I have fixated on something you can pull on. I am aware that to get a son, the Y is a recessive gene, you had better not pull on anything. So, yes I am leaving and everyone is quite sure it is good. I take my leave. And; I do have issues about Return; a conversation at a Convalescent Hospital. But, that will be a subject for another story.

The intended message the Prime Minister in Japan has and wants to remedy is about the Chinese ethic. I do not want to go into the mechanisms and theories about my leave, I do know for a fact my leave is not only a part of prayer, it is also a part of the body. Some guy says who writes about Adorno says the thing I am about is anthropomorphic. I take that to mean I would be in character Somatic. I would be described as weird. I don’t see it. What is it that the guy says is anthropomorphic about me? So, how does a person recover from leave? There is no remedy. Leave is the program. And, women’s issues are a point for China to receive Constructive Criticism.

So, getting back to Japan and China, there is some confusion about just exactly how they are relating. Japan is asking for China to be Transparent. I am confused about this. Is Japan hoping China will figure out how to put it in their self? Of course this is a question taking great liberty. And the return, will China be satisfied when the Feminist ethic yields cultural reform. I doubt that there will be any reform. No, everything the same; that there is an emphatic conditioning requirement expected. I am up to the task. So, what if China has been living their culture to the detriment of national success. If what China wants, and I am there to be made an example to the degree that they will get it from me, outside the box will hurt a little. And this conditioning, the process of becoming comfortable with, “Leave,” which has to take place slowly is probably appropriate for someone like me who is good with taking leave. It is an ancient culture and with the kind of time there is much to protect. If even a person were conscious of their prayer would it advance appropriately? Japan is disappointed that a person of public order couldn’t have a son. Japan says there must be change..

Now I am pretty intelligent about the order of things. This tertiary outcome, I am saying takes time and is described as conditioning, is nothing in comparison to the fact that there is a world. I stopped. There is a world. So, which is it? This really important truth that everything even our prayers ultimately provides the way for our knowledge to be reassuring? Or is there credence to a cultural assertiveness and patient understanding the better social platform. I do not think that Japan and China disagree. It just looks like Japan has the thinking for the cosmological story to proceed. And China is outside the box. Is China Disenchanted? Why do I get my mail when ever I think something is wrong here? Would China choose Yes, or No? Does China like Expressions. How about the Story of Peter Pan? Jackson Pollock, The Stone Roses, Kung Fu Hustle.

I have some updated views which will hopefully put this political message into another perspective.

The First Day of Class

The girl I wonder my content is too much about her. I think I am supposed to be writing, just not to her. Sure I have lots of ideas about writing. My main issue being I need to write more often. But my writing is probably more like revise, revise, revise, until my thoughts are no-longer a trace. This is supposed to be writing with more content rather than quality. I am quite sure you know how it sounds when you first set out to write for an example- ‘a poem’. It sounds like the guy from rush; kinda sciency and technical. Oh my God I remember that. All my metaphors were a process; It sucked.

Well, keep working on it; you will get better. Your voice will try to do something like Emmanuel Kant. This is just the beginning. Writing is pretty good most normally. Poetry is another creature. Are you OK with it. Hopefully your poems are in your notebook. After you are underway a while it sounds better; it is like pealing away the systems. The stuff that is left is art- basically.

Every so often when I begin and I should say I am a total geek. Assuming I am responsible for a childhood I have yet to realize why Humanities causes learning and science is tried out everywhere until it ends up in somebody’s journal soon to become a humanity and thus learning. If you are a chick, I recommend starting once in a while. I think I am just underneath the surface here. So, pick up an old ‘Rush’ album and put yourself through it. Well, technically, take or bring the book which ever, if it is a book; you have been at the beginning. Somewhere there is an adolescent who is going to loosen up. And somewhere there is a total geek whose tried enough stuff to take a humanity. Is this line of reason leading to the same place. If it is up to me, I will be sure there is a proud father somewhere.
Thanks.

Patina or Mold

I have been focusing my attention on the visual arts such as the fundamentals and functions of Color Theory. My primary artist and point from which I begin is from the work of Cezanne. But I also think color theory could be applied to movies such as The Dick Tracy Movie with Madonna (1990): Link to Dick Tracy Movie. I recall that color was relevant theoretically from one scene to the next. It is no accident that I should mention these examples. I do so because they effectively do the same function.

The resultant meta-social and deconstruction tendency in relation to color appears to have broadened the boundaries of sustainability in today’s American Culture. I know the inclination of a normal person would say, (one) that there must be some Record which sufficiently gathers substance is interpreted as if it were something you should know about, (two) or else something you couldn’t possibility know about but still persistent in your perceptions. I believe there are sufficient sources in place for the particular problem epitomized in the biographical data of Cezanne and not so much his paintings unless they were the subject of historical context, his paintings were for the time Crushingly Beautiful. The theories are still within us because as we have modernized they have taken root institutionally like a can of soup or an ink blot. The problem Cezanne had is happening less frequently. For people who have heard of him know that he did suffer and that painting was his pastime. We have Dick Tracy to thank for his contribution for at least three-quarters of the last century.

We would say even by general terms that suffering should not exist. I still manage these theories although it seems better to live while practicing them. It is not much different than normal life; a religion such as practicing Roman Catholic is recognized through out. Not only is “Jesus” known for his forgiveness, but the practice of religion is therapeutic. Such a study has been rigorous and it is rather pleasant for the solution to be a “way of life” popular in today’s culture.

Vincent’s Red Vineyard

redvinyard

This picture appeared in ARN’s Blogspot, an image from an Art Book. I gave a lot of citation info. It is a Vincent van Gogh. It was originally purchased by Eugene Boch, The Red Vineyard; one of the only paintings that van Gogh sold. It was painted in November 1888. Though at the Pushkin Museum in Moscow, it was rumored for sale to the US. It’s called the Red Vineyard; I believe it has recently been acquired. I have some enthusiasm. Hundred