Legal Case with Confucius Philosophy

The recent movement and popularity of Chinese Thought has another context. And, thankfully the context is a container worthy of a place in American culture. It is the Supreme Court Case WALLACE V. JAFFREE 472 U.S. 38 (1985). I do not doubt that the Supreme Court was aware of Confucius. So, I must try to stay within my topic, although I would like to resolve here with the advancement of the strictest argument from which the Supreme Court’s formed it’s ruling. That is the standpoint of Catholicism. All one needs to realize is at the time the moment of silence is to be observed, that time could also be used for indoctrination.

Whittle away at Confucius; Shackle at his time so as not to notice the intervals.

Human Beings are meant to live a hundred years, this man counted to a thousand just to get home. The next one spends a half of his life as a helpless child or spent half in sleep. Of the time that remains, half is added to mechanisms with increased complexity. So, what remains are all the various instances a person is plagued by pain, sickness, sorrow, bitterness, deaths, losses, worry, fear, and return. In sum, six years is hardly a measure at all of time in which a person can reason without needing any chance intervals- a perception of saving.

What is man’s life for? What pleasure is there in it? Is it for beauty and riches? Is it for color? When at a time beauty and riches no longer answer the needs of the heart, and when a surfeit of colors become only a weariness to the eyes, there are only remedies of which cheat history of the usual bad outcome. Do we live for the sake of being now crowed into submission by the fear of the Law and its penalties? We waste our rational faculties in a mad scramble of emotions none of which is worthy to note. What could be called a relationship is really a hollow praise of an hour, scheming to contrive that somehow some remnant of reputation shall outlast our lives.

We safely move through the various motions, in olden times it was a narrow groove; we are preoccupied with the various instances of those formulas that work for great men. Are we brooding over our prejudices, pretending the joys of life are among us without even knowing we only use those parts which are apparently missing? Consider for a moment you have a taste of the hardy wine of freedom. Should your anxiety be relieved, nothing gnawing at you, no perception of a need; is this also the character of transparency? We are truly imprisoned as if we lay at the bottom of a dungeon, heaped with chains but trusted and full of advice.

The men of grace and context know that life comes without warning, and as suddenly goes. They denied none of their natural inclinations, and repressed none of their bodily desires. They never felt the spur of fame. They sauntered through life gathering its pleasures as the impulse moved them. They filled in the cross roads, but they cared nothing for fame. In death they all have the same qualities and they all “pull snow.”

Now spurred to frenzied action by the promise of a reward or fame, the question is: were you a Cemetery or were you a Celebrity? Thus the myriad things are equal at birth, and again become equal in death. All are equally wise, equally foolish, equally noble, equally base.

Today people live fewer years to get home, others are employed many, but they all die. The benevolent sage dies just as dead as the wicked fool. Alive they were [the sage-kings] Yao and shum; dead, they are just rotten bones. Alive they were [the cruel tyrants] Lieh and Chou; dead, they are just rotten bones. And rotten bones are all alike; who can distinguish them? Then let us make the most of these moments. Try to notice the improvements and find ways of measuring them. We have to be concerned with what those have said…. always.

The Fundamental of Confucius

Early Chinese thought was recognized on the basis of Schema. Confucius identified it. Some of the political movements since have gone the opposite way. That is the inert persons responsible for the network of ideas, always a guy, has enjoyed better times since. The culture in China has vacillating within it military and political issues; yet there is an imperative. It is nearly systemic to the cultural makeup for the reason that the object for which people can talk is the cause of complications. It is inevitable that Schema will develop from the obstacle. Going on the basis of unity or the similarity of a conditioned thinking process, the emphasis for order and unity secures Confucius will recognize the absence of it. How does one ascend into grace, or achieve immunity from the encroaching Schema. This is my idea: assuming a person is sympathetic to the Schema, society and culture as it is good or bad gets congested; it would be satisfactory to sort of delete all of the various instances of the thought; all of them all at once. I refuse to believe that Confucius would not notice the silence. So, assuming the deletion has sufficiently affected the culture, it is marked as a waking for Confucius. Even though there is little written about the philosopher, Confucius evidently appears at instances when the schema has disappeared.

Have a Good Evening

MP3 reader/player for this post.

My automatic behavior on an evening when I just want complacency was marked with two, Yep you guessed it, (2) Problems. The question is nostalgically, do you want to read about my (2) all time best problems?

The first problem is: I pray that BOB doesn’t have any children. There is this guy BOB in Texas. People have tried to be creative about him, but I know like BOB pretty much everything is creative. I have this Ice-Cream Sandwich, and I’m happy. But I know at BOB’s best he is nothing more than a Tom and Jerry Cartoon; Jerry is his Dad. Now I know you know the bible story. It is the greatest story ever told. The Bible. Well anyway there is this lady; she retained her health. Her name is Mary. I am not sure about the rest, like what she said, what she saw, or if anyone else witnessed the same thing she did. Oh, Mary had a son; I tried to tell BOB, the guy in Texas. I would say he could have been God, but now I know the Bible story. BOB, the guy in Texas, has not married lord forgiving, so I guess everything is OK. That is all, like I should know the drill; but how will there be a Kingdom within a Kingdom. I just keep getting awkward about BOB. So, I try his story the same as the one in the bible, and I just get more and more unsure. That I laugh. Like the story I tell, what I am saying each sentence ends like gish – (I’m Laughing Out Loud).

This is the other one; no less epic. “Clay Jenkinson had sex with Mary Stockinger and he paid five dollars for it.” The title is longer then the first title, “The Bible” but this one is different. This story might not turn out as generic as the first. Well, Clay returns home from the distressing event. For his parents though they knew about what he did, they could not confront him. So they had a hissy-fit. Okay, a guy does the wrong thing. Like I said he had sex with Mary Stockinger. He doesn’t remember this so you might as well put it on the back burner. But that won’t work because every time he does the presentation, I call security and have him escorted off the stage. So, really as far as a story is concerned all there is is Clay Jenkinson and a little bit of scorn from his parents over Mary.

Clay Jenkinson remembered how much his parents hurt him, so when he discovered what his parents had used, The Declaration of Independence, to show their disapproval, he committed him self to it. He doesn’t see how this was punishment for the wrong thing. And, it is probably an ethic of his parents more than a general wrong thing. But, Clay falls dreadfully short of making a connection of the street sex and his parents scorn. The scorn part is how he involved himself with Jefferson. It was The Declaration of Independence then that Clay Jenkinson became a scholar.

So, as he performs before an audience in the character of Thomas Jefferson, I gently motion him off the stage as if a Security Guard were working with someone having inappropriate behavior. Not only is he festering in the scorn of his parents, he is undermining the peace of an American Historical Figure. This is my story and I’m saying that Clay Jenkinson does not understand his interest causally. So, the performances continue. I am not sure how to describe it; it is magic. I do not want any trouble. Just for the record, I need to let you know that Thomas Jefferson had sex with an African American woman, not a prostitute.

All of these (2) Stories are reserved for a time when I want to relax and enjoy a good evening.

Madonna I’m “TEV2”

I want to know a little more about Madonna. Confessions is really great. I would never say that about anyone unless I thought they were equipped to process it. Admittedly though I do not think I could differentiate a Paranoid person from the Performer. It would help a lot if I could tell what I am [a boy / a girl]; I am TEV2. The last few times I took a 48D; which with the given in-site, is passing at that, I discovered I’m right where I’m at! Did she go somewhere else? Hell no. From the repertoire of things I am able to do, that they are not a public spectacle, I can only hope that they would be appropriate; but that I am acting on the basis that I believe what I am doing is in fact in agreement with the Truth of what I am doing. Basically, don’t go somewhere else. The thoughts should be accepted on the basis of their merits; sometimes it’s itself.

Madonna has correct thinking! So just how is Madonna doing? Madonna’s web site is pretty good. I was reminded of the type (real clean) with none of the “euroMA” high end negatives that come with the Madonna territory. I have been won. She really has all her stuff tuned up. “Hello? Madonna? I want to sign your guest book. First though, could we see where we’re at with Max Allen Collins?”

If it were not for the name as his talent, he never would have flipped Dick Tracy over, run him ragged through various instances of Cezanne, and twisted him until we should accept the compromising psychiatric circumstance of, “she should have made it easier for him to forgive,” he would have got this stuff long ago. But he is his name, and he still hides behind it. Did Max Allen Collins ever do any moonlighting? As usual, people work. The worse the tweaking, the harder it is on the people who work. The essentials though we have to work once straightened out makes it a lot easier for us. I mean we won’t have to work quite as hard.

Getting back to the person I want to talk about. I say; yeah. yea; it is the name thing, and Madonna has the thinking; I can hear it. Everything is in the best of all possible places. So, anyway, Max is the guy who hangs there just because he can tell there are similarities; like agreement. To get this you would have to have studied for years on the Chester Gould’s Dick Tracy. You would have had to realize that Devitt is a good name given similar circumstances. I will tell you that it will come up at the right time; and you will have the correct thinking too. And with the correct thinking; it is just the most amazing, “would be song.” Since when is a name bad on the basis that it is mean!

God where did my childhood go? No, No, I am responsible; I am no ‘nvu’. I have been in Roe v. Wade a while during my childhood. So, that is about the sum total of it; Right? I guess I matured enough not to be in danger of getting chosen. The rule is 1.2.3. Candidly, I would have been a lot better off if I had been Catholic. Even The Catholic Project Rachel has correct thinking. Project Rachel is the Catholic version of Roe V. Wade. That’s amazing to me!

Especially noteworthy since I’m on the topic, I am not flip-flopping either. Madonna? pick up. I just want to give credit where credit is due. This is not an invitation either, and I am betting that if I never get a response from Madonna, confessions is enough. Beyond that, which people often try; this is “TEV2.” And so I am a boy and I have everything. If nothing else this reading has been in-creditable.

While great songs are written and the few Rock Stars have become the Many Stars, I could only reward myself by giving my dad an award.

Cezanne’s Centennial 2006

Get ready! I have to acknowledge this year is the Centennial (100 years) Anniversary of Paul Cezanne’s death. He was born on January 19, 1839 and passed away October 22, 1906. He was a very great artist, and there is no shortage of information about him as a man. There is a lesson which I have learned from years of study about him. I think about Cézanne every single day of my life. I live in a region that is an equivalent in climate to France. The fact that he suffered psychiatrically is predicative in the many descriptions of his Masterful Paintings.

I am happy I do not have the illness he had. There is a great deal of support structures in our American culture to be sure Cezanne was the last famous person to suffer his own thinking in a certain way. In the United States he would be considered to have Schizophrenia.

My particular situation in my youth caused me to get angry without even knowing what I was trying to prevent. I fought through most of my childhood, and it turns out the issue is about my name and not my situation. I should do something for fear a person might suffer as he did.

The community I live in has largely been critical of my position on Cézanne, however this temperament is local. If you find yourself interested in Cezanne there really is an Idea; not just a patina or a mold. And, the bottom line categorically is that I’ve learned something about Genes. Those are pretty much set; so, don’t expect any changes in your Genetic make-up.

Cezanne’s Anniversary

First note on Childhood Friend

I am the childhood friend for Brendan. We have been friends since second grade. Oh, he is married and works as an architect in New York. The big news is his birthday. It was this month. As has many childhood friends, we have drifted apart. I think about it and I am proud to have been his friend. I was a good friend to him. I provided ample thickness of thought and in return he developed a complicated set of required actions.

Many years later, I have worked at those self improvement actions. I still want to work and thus I want to get a start. Yeah, I want to crawl though my childhood and discover ways to improve. If it is something I can finish I would do it. The most amazing part of this experience was that I learned Brendan was a particular friend.

The various instances of his name, those people who look like him, his birthday class, and his sound are all instances of transference- he does none of it. He was a particular friend. Particularly. The episode from which I am most worked is one from a play by Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot. It is the first act where I am his what. Act II is after I have sufficiently learned my lesson to the extent that I am the Particular friend in another context. I have my own relationship with someone; an episode (Act I) and I have someone who is my friend. I get to do the work.

I have become immune to transference. So just in regards to Brendan, I want to give sufficient notice I am ready for his Act II. I will get through either act, but that they are not on the same plane. Do not worry, it is good. I am happy. I know what is happening and I think of the humanities with sympathy. It looks like a pay stub. Now, I come out of Act II sufficiently strong enough for my own version of Act I. So, I’m not really getting out of anything, but I have moved up. I just wanted to let you know.

We’re Getting Along

I am fascinated by the Japan and China exchange.

If I had to choose between the two I would choose China. But I am just being honest about my history. Just a little more about that; I am willing to admit that Sony is a bad name as is my family name on my mother’s side: Polson. Basically the problems these two countries are going through are based on circumstances that could be explained easily just knowing that.

Yet I get just underneath the surface, and I can understand the political issues. Koizumi, who is I guess ending his political position is somewhat bitter about having not had any sons. His claim is that China has enjoyed the benefits of its culture, a rather assertive feminist disposition. I am like what? There are women in practically every facet of my life. I learned about women’s issues. Should I be defensive about my own conscience of this imbalance? I say imbalance only to the extent that I know my best ability in contrast to myself knowledge; I leave and I am good. Assuming I am leaving as predicated by my own personal substance such as a social function, the facts about me such as my self knowledge, I also expect my constituency to also have knowledge. But, to leave similarly; I do not think I would have any gain from that proceeding. It is almost as if I have fixated on something you can pull on. I am aware that to get a son, the Y is a recessive gene, you had better not pull on anything. So, yes I am leaving and everyone is quite sure it is good. I take my leave. And; I do have issues about Return; a conversation at a Convalescent Hospital. But, that will be a subject for another story.

The intended message the Prime Minister in Japan has and wants to remedy is about the Chinese ethic. I do not want to go into the mechanisms and theories about my leave, I do know for a fact my leave is not only a part of prayer, it is also a part of the body. Some guy says who writes about Adorno says the thing I am about is anthropomorphic. I take that to mean I would be in character Somatic. I would be described as weird. I don’t see it. What is it that the guy says is anthropomorphic about me? So, how does a person recover from leave? There is no remedy. Leave is the program. And, women’s issues are a point for China to receive Constructive Criticism.

So, getting back to Japan and China, there is some confusion about just exactly how they are relating. Japan is asking for China to be Transparent. I am confused about this. Is Japan hoping China will figure out how to put it in their self? Of course this is a question taking great liberty. And the return, will China be satisfied when the Feminist ethic yields cultural reform. I doubt that there will be any reform. No, everything the same; that there is an emphatic conditioning requirement expected. I am up to the task. So, what if China has been living their culture to the detriment of national success. If what China wants, and I am there to be made an example to the degree that they will get it from me, outside the box will hurt a little. And this conditioning, the process of becoming comfortable with, “Leave,” which has to take place slowly is probably appropriate for someone like me who is good with taking leave. It is an ancient culture and with the kind of time there is much to protect. If even a person were conscious of their prayer would it advance appropriately? Japan is disappointed that a person of public order couldn’t have a son. Japan says there must be change..

Now I am pretty intelligent about the order of things. This tertiary outcome, I am saying takes time and is described as conditioning, is nothing in comparison to the fact that there is a world. I stopped. There is a world. So, which is it? This really important truth that everything even our prayers ultimately provides the way for our knowledge to be reassuring? Or is there credence to a cultural assertiveness and patient understanding the better social platform. I do not think that Japan and China disagree. It just looks like Japan has the thinking for the cosmological story to proceed. And China is outside the box. Is China Disenchanted? Why do I get my mail when ever I think something is wrong here? Would China choose Yes, or No? Does China like Expressions. How about the Story of Peter Pan? Jackson Pollock, The Stone Roses, Kung Fu Hustle.

I have some updated views which will hopefully put this political message into another perspective.

You have encountered a WALL

This is what you must say at one of those present moments. It’s one of those people that will never retaliate so they say all the stuff that is triggered to get you to talk with ‘not like’. A person collects those scraps as drivers and implements them on you. While inside out you either fill with what the person likes in the case where you need a line. “Line please!” Or it is really true about what side of the desk you are on; it’s a staff client relationship. For this latter case you don’t get a chance to confront with your feelings because it is removed from the context. It is usually better to not go out of your way because it is well messy. So try to work in a way that you stay with the ones like you. So, here is what you should say in a present moment;

I get it. It is all up to me; Is that right? I’m supposed to take a prerogative. I know this one. You offer a service. Then you use the system to break it down. If it is a service, and I think it is, I’m going to tell you; you haven’t been updated. The whole key to working the wrinkle out of this old system is to realize A person shouldn’t suffer.

I especially like this passage because if the person is that well able to manage a social exchange they are certainly subject to the idea that, though PI is a number, you are a person and that you deserve to be talked to as if you are the correct person.

The First Day of Class

The girl I wonder my content is too much about her. I think I am supposed to be writing, just not to her. Sure I have lots of ideas about writing. My main issue being I need to write more often. But my writing is probably more like revise, revise, revise, until my thoughts are no-longer a trace. This is supposed to be writing with more content rather than quality. I am quite sure you know how it sounds when you first set out to write for an example- ‘a poem’. It sounds like the guy from rush; kinda sciency and technical. Oh my God I remember that. All my metaphors were a process; It sucked.

Well, keep working on it; you will get better. Your voice will try to do something like Emmanuel Kant. This is just the beginning. Writing is pretty good most normally. Poetry is another creature. Are you OK with it. Hopefully your poems are in your notebook. After you are underway a while it sounds better; it is like pealing away the systems. The stuff that is left is art- basically.

Every so often when I begin and I should say I am a total geek. Assuming I am responsible for a childhood I have yet to realize why Humanities causes learning and science is tried out everywhere until it ends up in somebody’s journal soon to become a humanity and thus learning. If you are a chick, I recommend starting once in a while. I think I am just underneath the surface here. So, pick up an old ‘Rush’ album and put yourself through it. Well, technically, take or bring the book which ever, if it is a book; you have been at the beginning. Somewhere there is an adolescent who is going to loosen up. And somewhere there is a total geek whose tried enough stuff to take a humanity. Is this line of reason leading to the same place. If it is up to me, I will be sure there is a proud father somewhere.
Thanks.