Phenomenology

I am going to discuss my personal views about someone who is very important to me; Merleau-Ponty. From my first recollection, I did not like Ponty. The fact is those feelings guaranteed me an automatic ‘F’. I can tell that I have made progress in my opinion since – as evidence by my erasure of comments in the margins of his greatest work: Eye and Mind.

So I cleaned up my copy of his essay. Merleau-Ponty who was a French Philosopher wrote about the Master French painter Cezanne. After Ponty passed away in the early sixties, his works were translated into English. The translator, Carleton Dallery used a number of writing styles to achieve an effective and purposeful study for the English speaking scholar to learn about Cezanne. The consequences for my strong feelings against Merleau-Ponty at that first reading are not outside of the realm of possibilities for any reader. It might be the case that Carleton Dallery at the expense of being perceived as not knowing a certain detail about Cezanne, embedded a critical idea which does not come to fruition in order to affect the reader with strong feelings. Not however, but particularly for Ponty, space has taken on a kind of identity. I have had difficulty overcoming my initial opinion and further hold by some fault of my own I have come up short on wits. Thus I must reason I had at that time the condition about which I have already talked about a necessity for agreement. This is in keeping with my latter readings, and I want to reassure Dick Tracy that I like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and that I understand his essay; I admit it is a great work.

You are a fool! So, you say you like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, but you have changed. Why you don’t convict him for your disposition?

Well, I will tell you, my friend, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s English translation has as a remedy something called a Rhinoplasty. This is a Plastic Surgery correcting the Septum from deviation. These were his last words, ‘you have your whole life ahead of you.’ I got a Rhinoplasty. It has been the single most enlightening procedure of my Life.

If you are able to sustain a frame of mind on that of a person whose fingers are stubby, you will learn. There are a number of builds that are available to muse with; all of which raises your social status. I am telling you this because there is a reason that a Dominant Gene results in a Conscience. The Dominant Genes of this particular type in a person who has one from each parent, results in a disorder, called Phocomelia, and which causes a birth defect of the arms and hands. Phocomelia literally means Flippers. The genetic disposition, I am calling a Disorder, includes the making of the Conscience where there is only one Dominant Gene of which it is the same type. Here the Idea is that you get your genes from your parents. This is a normal condition to have one, or to have both Recessive. The infamous Luke Sky-walker was Recessive-Recessive; “Use the Force Luke”. And this very issue which sadly Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not correctly develop for some reason, is a Distinguishing component of socialization.

When the Philosopher says existentially NO!; it is to be a distinguishing threshold in which we enlightened the path to Fame. For example you would not want a person with a conscience to read the news or write lyrics for an album unless the person were able to overcome the present with new material. What you have said about my acceptance of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is probably a thought disorder.

To make this situation which I have built in thought whole, I just want to mention that there is another reading of David Hume. His thoughts mostly have been about the good of determination. But if you needed an advocate for your applied distinguishing activity, which I have said is Genetic, Hume has the correct thinking for a free minded person of a general nature to be an advocate. So, on the basis that this issue is Genetic, I conclude that there will be NO changes in the thinking process – no fear. I say this and I expect you to believe that you are who you are ever since conception. Now, haven’t I been a nuisance, a person should not have Fear? And haven’t I just given you a good reason to teach Hume even though his works only seem to fit with a certain type of a person?

If for some reason, the little friendship that Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre had while the editors of the magazine in France the prejudice against Maurice Merleau-Ponty still went without address, his reason is there really is something to see: and I am referring to Phenomenology. Maurice Merleau-Ponty would have been the president of that little organization of Cosmonauts.

Now, I have a little bit of house keeping to do for Maurice Merleau-Ponty that I haven’t addressed elsewhere. While Maurice Merleau-Ponty had a driver which never came to fruition. I have mentioned it earlier, there is a confusion about which gene he is referring to. Let me say that when I was referring to a Dominant Gene, it is conceivable the inherited dominant gene for conscience could have come from either parent and not just the Father. Though he did not speak of it, he was all the while referring to another Gene; it was a driver to get a person to have strong feelings. In the Philosophical work Eye and Mind, which he is best known for and which he sort of built a little engine “see,” Maurice Merleau-Ponty, though I do not believe it today, there is a tendency to confuse the gene for sex with the gene for conscience. Recall that Maurice Merleau-Ponty mostly ignored the prompting from Sartre about the Genetic issue. So, when the prejudicial perspective that Sartre would have prompted him about in their years together came up, Maurice Merleau-Ponty probably extended his most highest held belief, to see, in the instance that it is restricted to that of the spirit of the Father. In the case of the Fathers Gene, the Genetic issue is in regards to the twenty-third Chromosome determining a person’s sex. In a remedy, from the religious point of view involving the Holy Trinity, after thoughts (God willing), the Father could have a high degree of influence over his children’s cognitive abilities. Here I want to mention that this is as much a disparity as that of the twenty-second Chromosome which determines conscience. So, even though I have been square about a Distinguishing social issue, the presiding gene, I have had to bring into the discussion a matter of articulation of Maurice Merleau-Pontys emphasis as having a gene that could inconceivably been inherited from the Mother as well as from the Father. It is the Holy Trinity case the Philosopher Spinoza had as a good Catholic. Maurice Merleau-Ponty merely cast into time for a collection of intelligent substance with which seeing would be the basis of a Phenomenology without the context involving the gene for sexual orientation.

I seem to have uncovered a matter of confusion. If you wish to think about this issue look at XVR and Comments to XVR

Living History and Chinese Objects

Well; that just about wraps up everything. The question remaining in the mind of the reader, Why China? I am not the person to point out that what has been working as a culture for thousands of years is wrong. For one there is reiteration; which means there is enough reinforcement for the pattern to re-occur. Neither am I the person who should say after unity & order the process has a bad outcome. From what you know; wouldn’t these observations have already surfaced? For me however, this is the setting in which my emotional self flourishes. I noticed some things about me I thought I had a problem with; and I realized they were parts of an emotional self. The fact that I have feelings is in agreement with China. As far as I am able to use my resources, I will always get reinforcement from China for expressing my feelings even if I were disappointed. If I had to describe them I would say they are from the object “Diplomacy”.

I have this disposition. I know already that I diplomacy speak harsh words about China: a foreign Country. But this is just because I diplomacy made the thinking incorrect based on my diplomatic perceptions. So my comment must diplomacy limit my scope. I know that this culture China does not accept the western beliefs from Berkeley. Or if China did, there is the opening for that of a fan which over many years I still do not know of. Where is my fan? This fissure does not have a remedy because the emphasis is on the problem of a female relative to Berkeley. But it is a conditioned thinking element of culture which satisfies the requirement of unity and order. Assuming that this is just an account of sufferings and disenchantment my diplomacy would be forced to correctly establish myself as the authority to it. This counts as an explanation for me, the proceeding would have been the outcome of my own doing. This must be an activity of Chinese Culture. Thousands of years have passed, and China has a repertoire of living experiences the people can recognize. This must mean everything to China to have a living history.

Madonna I’m “TEV2”

I want to know a little more about Madonna. Confessions is really great. I would never say that about anyone unless I thought they were equipped to process it. Admittedly though I do not think I could differentiate a Paranoid person from the Performer. It would help a lot if I could tell what I am [a boy / a girl]; I am TEV2. The last few times I took a 48D; which with the given in-site, is passing at that, I discovered I’m right where I’m at! Did she go somewhere else? Hell no. From the repertoire of things I am able to do, that they are not a public spectacle, I can only hope that they would be appropriate; but that I am acting on the basis that I believe what I am doing is in fact in agreement with the Truth of what I am doing. Basically, don’t go somewhere else. The thoughts should be accepted on the basis of their merits; sometimes it’s itself.

Madonna has correct thinking! So just how is Madonna doing? Madonna’s web site is pretty good. I was reminded of the type (real clean) with none of the “euroMA” high end negatives that come with the Madonna territory. I have been won. She really has all her stuff tuned up. “Hello? Madonna? I want to sign your guest book. First though, could we see where we’re at with Max Allen Collins?”

If it were not for the name as his talent, he never would have flipped Dick Tracy over, run him ragged through various instances of Cezanne, and twisted him until we should accept the compromising psychiatric circumstance of, “she should have made it easier for him to forgive,” he would have got this stuff long ago. But he is his name, and he still hides behind it. Did Max Allen Collins ever do any moonlighting? As usual, people work. The worse the tweaking, the harder it is on the people who work. The essentials though we have to work once straightened out makes it a lot easier for us. I mean we won’t have to work quite as hard.

Getting back to the person I want to talk about. I say; yeah. yea; it is the name thing, and Madonna has the thinking; I can hear it. Everything is in the best of all possible places. So, anyway, Max is the guy who hangs there just because he can tell there are similarities; like agreement. To get this you would have to have studied for years on the Chester Gould’s Dick Tracy. You would have had to realize that Devitt is a good name given similar circumstances. I will tell you that it will come up at the right time; and you will have the correct thinking too. And with the correct thinking; it is just the most amazing, “would be song.” Since when is a name bad on the basis that it is mean!

God where did my childhood go? No, No, I am responsible; I am no ‘nvu’. I have been in Roe v. Wade a while during my childhood. So, that is about the sum total of it; Right? I guess I matured enough not to be in danger of getting chosen. The rule is 1.2.3. Candidly, I would have been a lot better off if I had been Catholic. Even The Catholic Project Rachel has correct thinking. Project Rachel is the Catholic version of Roe V. Wade. That’s amazing to me!

Especially noteworthy since I’m on the topic, I am not flip-flopping either. Madonna? pick up. I just want to give credit where credit is due. This is not an invitation either, and I am betting that if I never get a response from Madonna, confessions is enough. Beyond that, which people often try; this is “TEV2.” And so I am a boy and I have everything. If nothing else this reading has been in-creditable.

While great songs are written and the few Rock Stars have become the Many Stars, I could only reward myself by giving my dad an award.

Cezanne’s Centennial 2006

Get ready! I have to acknowledge this year is the Centennial (100 years) Anniversary of Paul Cezanne’s death. He was born on January 19, 1839 and passed away October 22, 1906. He was a very great artist, and there is no shortage of information about him as a man. There is a lesson which I have learned from years of study about him. I think about Cézanne every single day of my life. I live in a region that is an equivalent in climate to France. The fact that he suffered psychiatrically is predicative in the many descriptions of his Masterful Paintings.

I am happy I do not have the illness he had. There is a great deal of support structures in our American culture to be sure Cezanne was the last famous person to suffer his own thinking in a certain way. In the United States he would be considered to have Schizophrenia.

My particular situation in my youth caused me to get angry without even knowing what I was trying to prevent. I fought through most of my childhood, and it turns out the issue is about my name and not my situation. I should do something for fear a person might suffer as he did.

The community I live in has largely been critical of my position on Cézanne, however this temperament is local. If you find yourself interested in Cezanne there really is an Idea; not just a patina or a mold. And, the bottom line categorically is that I’ve learned something about Genes. Those are pretty much set; so, don’t expect any changes in your Genetic make-up.

Cezanne’s Anniversary

We’re Getting Along

I am fascinated by the Japan and China exchange.

If I had to choose between the two I would choose China. But I am just being honest about my history. Just a little more about that; I am willing to admit that Sony is a bad name as is my family name on my mother’s side: Polson. Basically the problems these two countries are going through are based on circumstances that could be explained easily just knowing that.

Yet I get just underneath the surface, and I can understand the political issues. Koizumi, who is I guess ending his political position is somewhat bitter about having not had any sons. His claim is that China has enjoyed the benefits of its culture, a rather assertive feminist disposition. I am like what? There are women in practically every facet of my life. I learned about women’s issues. Should I be defensive about my own conscience of this imbalance? I say imbalance only to the extent that I know my best ability in contrast to myself knowledge; I leave and I am good. Assuming I am leaving as predicated by my own personal substance such as a social function, the facts about me such as my self knowledge, I also expect my constituency to also have knowledge. But, to leave similarly; I do not think I would have any gain from that proceeding. It is almost as if I have fixated on something you can pull on. I am aware that to get a son, the Y is a recessive gene, you had better not pull on anything. So, yes I am leaving and everyone is quite sure it is good. I take my leave. And; I do have issues about Return; a conversation at a Convalescent Hospital. But, that will be a subject for another story.

The intended message the Prime Minister in Japan has and wants to remedy is about the Chinese ethic. I do not want to go into the mechanisms and theories about my leave, I do know for a fact my leave is not only a part of prayer, it is also a part of the body. Some guy says who writes about Adorno says the thing I am about is anthropomorphic. I take that to mean I would be in character Somatic. I would be described as weird. I don’t see it. What is it that the guy says is anthropomorphic about me? So, how does a person recover from leave? There is no remedy. Leave is the program. And, women’s issues are a point for China to receive Constructive Criticism.

So, getting back to Japan and China, there is some confusion about just exactly how they are relating. Japan is asking for China to be Transparent. I am confused about this. Is Japan hoping China will figure out how to put it in their self? Of course this is a question taking great liberty. And the return, will China be satisfied when the Feminist ethic yields cultural reform. I doubt that there will be any reform. No, everything the same; that there is an emphatic conditioning requirement expected. I am up to the task. So, what if China has been living their culture to the detriment of national success. If what China wants, and I am there to be made an example to the degree that they will get it from me, outside the box will hurt a little. And this conditioning, the process of becoming comfortable with, “Leave,” which has to take place slowly is probably appropriate for someone like me who is good with taking leave. It is an ancient culture and with the kind of time there is much to protect. If even a person were conscious of their prayer would it advance appropriately? Japan is disappointed that a person of public order couldn’t have a son. Japan says there must be change..

Now I am pretty intelligent about the order of things. This tertiary outcome, I am saying takes time and is described as conditioning, is nothing in comparison to the fact that there is a world. I stopped. There is a world. So, which is it? This really important truth that everything even our prayers ultimately provides the way for our knowledge to be reassuring? Or is there credence to a cultural assertiveness and patient understanding the better social platform. I do not think that Japan and China disagree. It just looks like Japan has the thinking for the cosmological story to proceed. And China is outside the box. Is China Disenchanted? Why do I get my mail when ever I think something is wrong here? Would China choose Yes, or No? Does China like Expressions. How about the Story of Peter Pan? Jackson Pollock, The Stone Roses, Kung Fu Hustle.

I have some updated views which will hopefully put this political message into another perspective.

The First Day of Class

The girl I wonder my content is too much about her. I think I am supposed to be writing, just not to her. Sure I have lots of ideas about writing. My main issue being I need to write more often. But my writing is probably more like revise, revise, revise, until my thoughts are no-longer a trace. This is supposed to be writing with more content rather than quality. I am quite sure you know how it sounds when you first set out to write for an example- ‘a poem’. It sounds like the guy from rush; kinda sciency and technical. Oh my God I remember that. All my metaphors were a process; It sucked.

Well, keep working on it; you will get better. Your voice will try to do something like Emmanuel Kant. This is just the beginning. Writing is pretty good most normally. Poetry is another creature. Are you OK with it. Hopefully your poems are in your notebook. After you are underway a while it sounds better; it is like pealing away the systems. The stuff that is left is art- basically.

Every so often when I begin and I should say I am a total geek. Assuming I am responsible for a childhood I have yet to realize why Humanities causes learning and science is tried out everywhere until it ends up in somebody’s journal soon to become a humanity and thus learning. If you are a chick, I recommend starting once in a while. I think I am just underneath the surface here. So, pick up an old ‘Rush’ album and put yourself through it. Well, technically, take or bring the book which ever, if it is a book; you have been at the beginning. Somewhere there is an adolescent who is going to loosen up. And somewhere there is a total geek whose tried enough stuff to take a humanity. Is this line of reason leading to the same place. If it is up to me, I will be sure there is a proud father somewhere.
Thanks.

Patina or Mold

I have been focusing my attention on the visual arts such as the fundamentals and functions of Color Theory. My primary artist and point from which I begin is from the work of Cezanne. But I also think color theory could be applied to movies such as The Dick Tracy Movie with Madonna (1990): Link to Dick Tracy Movie. I recall that color was relevant theoretically from one scene to the next. It is no accident that I should mention these examples. I do so because they effectively do the same function.

The resultant meta-social and deconstruction tendency in relation to color appears to have broadened the boundaries of sustainability in today’s American Culture. I know the inclination of a normal person would say, (one) that there must be some Record which sufficiently gathers substance is interpreted as if it were something you should know about, (two) or else something you couldn’t possibility know about but still persistent in your perceptions. I believe there are sufficient sources in place for the particular problem epitomized in the biographical data of Cezanne and not so much his paintings unless they were the subject of historical context, his paintings were for the time Crushingly Beautiful. The theories are still within us because as we have modernized they have taken root institutionally like a can of soup or an ink blot. The problem Cezanne had is happening less frequently. For people who have heard of him know that he did suffer and that painting was his pastime. We have Dick Tracy to thank for his contribution for at least three-quarters of the last century.

We would say even by general terms that suffering should not exist. I still manage these theories although it seems better to live while practicing them. It is not much different than normal life; a religion such as practicing Roman Catholic is recognized through out. Not only is “Jesus” known for his forgiveness, but the practice of religion is therapeutic. Such a study has been rigorous and it is rather pleasant for the solution to be a “way of life” popular in today’s culture.

Vincent’s Red Vineyard

redvinyard

This picture appeared in ARN’s Blogspot, an image from an Art Book. I gave a lot of citation info. It is a Vincent van Gogh. It was originally purchased by Eugene Boch, The Red Vineyard; one of the only paintings that van Gogh sold. It was painted in November 1888. Though at the Pushkin Museum in Moscow, it was rumored for sale to the US. It’s called the Red Vineyard; I believe it has recently been acquired. I have some enthusiasm. Hundred