Phenomenology

I am going to discuss my personal views about someone who is very important to me; Merleau-Ponty. From my first recollection, I did not like Ponty. The fact is those feelings guaranteed me an automatic ‘F’. I can tell that I have made progress in my opinion since – as evidence by my erasure of comments in the margins of his greatest work: Eye and Mind.

So I cleaned up my copy of his essay. Merleau-Ponty who was a French Philosopher wrote about the Master French painter Cezanne. After Ponty passed away in the early sixties, his works were translated into English. The translator, Carleton Dallery used a number of writing styles to achieve an effective and purposeful study for the English speaking scholar to learn about Cezanne. The consequences for my strong feelings against Merleau-Ponty at that first reading are not outside of the realm of possibilities for any reader. It might be the case that Carleton Dallery at the expense of being perceived as not knowing a certain detail about Cezanne, embedded a critical idea which does not come to fruition in order to affect the reader with strong feelings. Not however, but particularly for Ponty, space has taken on a kind of identity. I have had difficulty overcoming my initial opinion and further hold by some fault of my own I have come up short on wits. Thus I must reason I had at that time the condition about which I have already talked about a necessity for agreement. This is in keeping with my latter readings, and I want to reassure Dick Tracy that I like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and that I understand his essay; I admit it is a great work.

You are a fool! So, you say you like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, but you have changed. Why you don’t convict him for your disposition?

Well, I will tell you, my friend, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s English translation has as a remedy something called a Rhinoplasty. This is a Plastic Surgery correcting the Septum from deviation. These were his last words, ‘you have your whole life ahead of you.’ I got a Rhinoplasty. It has been the single most enlightening procedure of my Life.

If you are able to sustain a frame of mind on that of a person whose fingers are stubby, you will learn. There are a number of builds that are available to muse with; all of which raises your social status. I am telling you this because there is a reason that a Dominant Gene results in a Conscience. The Dominant Genes of this particular type in a person who has one from each parent, results in a disorder, called Phocomelia, and which causes a birth defect of the arms and hands. Phocomelia literally means Flippers. The genetic disposition, I am calling a Disorder, includes the making of the Conscience where there is only one Dominant Gene of which it is the same type. Here the Idea is that you get your genes from your parents. This is a normal condition to have one, or to have both Recessive. The infamous Luke Sky-walker was Recessive-Recessive; “Use the Force Luke”. And this very issue which sadly Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not correctly develop for some reason, is a Distinguishing component of socialization.

When the Philosopher says existentially NO!; it is to be a distinguishing threshold in which we enlightened the path to Fame. For example you would not want a person with a conscience to read the news or write lyrics for an album unless the person were able to overcome the present with new material. What you have said about my acceptance of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is probably a thought disorder.

To make this situation which I have built in thought whole, I just want to mention that there is another reading of David Hume. His thoughts mostly have been about the good of determination. But if you needed an advocate for your applied distinguishing activity, which I have said is Genetic, Hume has the correct thinking for a free minded person of a general nature to be an advocate. So, on the basis that this issue is Genetic, I conclude that there will be NO changes in the thinking process – no fear. I say this and I expect you to believe that you are who you are ever since conception. Now, haven’t I been a nuisance, a person should not have Fear? And haven’t I just given you a good reason to teach Hume even though his works only seem to fit with a certain type of a person?

If for some reason, the little friendship that Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre had while the editors of the magazine in France the prejudice against Maurice Merleau-Ponty still went without address, his reason is there really is something to see: and I am referring to Phenomenology. Maurice Merleau-Ponty would have been the president of that little organization of Cosmonauts.

Now, I have a little bit of house keeping to do for Maurice Merleau-Ponty that I haven’t addressed elsewhere. While Maurice Merleau-Ponty had a driver which never came to fruition. I have mentioned it earlier, there is a confusion about which gene he is referring to. Let me say that when I was referring to a Dominant Gene, it is conceivable the inherited dominant gene for conscience could have come from either parent and not just the Father. Though he did not speak of it, he was all the while referring to another Gene; it was a driver to get a person to have strong feelings. In the Philosophical work Eye and Mind, which he is best known for and which he sort of built a little engine “see,” Maurice Merleau-Ponty, though I do not believe it today, there is a tendency to confuse the gene for sex with the gene for conscience. Recall that Maurice Merleau-Ponty mostly ignored the prompting from Sartre about the Genetic issue. So, when the prejudicial perspective that Sartre would have prompted him about in their years together came up, Maurice Merleau-Ponty probably extended his most highest held belief, to see, in the instance that it is restricted to that of the spirit of the Father. In the case of the Fathers Gene, the Genetic issue is in regards to the twenty-third Chromosome determining a person’s sex. In a remedy, from the religious point of view involving the Holy Trinity, after thoughts (God willing), the Father could have a high degree of influence over his children’s cognitive abilities. Here I want to mention that this is as much a disparity as that of the twenty-second Chromosome which determines conscience. So, even though I have been square about a Distinguishing social issue, the presiding gene, I have had to bring into the discussion a matter of articulation of Maurice Merleau-Pontys emphasis as having a gene that could inconceivably been inherited from the Mother as well as from the Father. It is the Holy Trinity case the Philosopher Spinoza had as a good Catholic. Maurice Merleau-Ponty merely cast into time for a collection of intelligent substance with which seeing would be the basis of a Phenomenology without the context involving the gene for sexual orientation.

I seem to have uncovered a matter of confusion. If you wish to think about this issue look at XVR and Comments to XVR

A nice man’s story

Read My Comments: 1. Cavity 2. Expensive

I will empower, indemnify, and uncover the meaning of these words. It all started when a terrible man coveted me to the extent I could not manage my social affairs. After nine years his musings became like music to me. I was unique and I learned his language. If you want to know what it is like to have your own corner of world to live in, perhaps you could bare with me to see what meaning is in store for just two words. I know you are asking why I should expose a man by sharing, when it is clear I like his language has he has imposed on me. I became a great story teller. The man has passed away. The insight no less important has disappeared. The two words openly deployed before you had meaning to me and the man. If I do not tell, they will be lost words. I am alerted they have already fallen from my highest esteem with his passing.

I need not point out the need for improvement in the dental hygiene area. I think the problem started early in 2003 when I became the subject of a campaign of hate and scorn from my dental clinic. My factual information was coalesced with scant biographical information. It was disseminated anonymously by California’s Western Dental. A billing office located in Orange County was identified as the culprit.

Basically after a year I managed to stop them from sending the email; all I had to do was acknowledge them. I have found that quite generally I often discern my adversary. This often includes a certain directive which in this case I had satisfied by the year’s end.

The next word: Expensive. I am at a loss as to exactly what the meaning was. My intuition tells me I had been excited about something which was neither true nor measurable and which lead to an associatively deeper sort of truth. It was an idea that never came to fruition and still reinforced a person to accept it on emotional grounds. Of course I recall it (Expensive is another way to explain a need for an integral). This must have been what I did to recognize Western Dental’s directive. My name had become Hugh Farrell. I reasoned these people without quite knowing what was required, had placed great importance on their information about me. I must have navigated through my process and resolved their directive as one of my accomplishments. This must have been in agreement with a fundamental premise of the Dental Clinic with the name Western Dental. Even in the situation where I am compromised from their having given out my information I am still willing to give them a start; “Where would you go if you had a cavity?”

Living History and Chinese Objects

Well; that just about wraps up everything. The question remaining in the mind of the reader, Why China? I am not the person to point out that what has been working as a culture for thousands of years is wrong. For one there is reiteration; which means there is enough reinforcement for the pattern to re-occur. Neither am I the person who should say after unity & order the process has a bad outcome. From what you know; wouldn’t these observations have already surfaced? For me however, this is the setting in which my emotional self flourishes. I noticed some things about me I thought I had a problem with; and I realized they were parts of an emotional self. The fact that I have feelings is in agreement with China. As far as I am able to use my resources, I will always get reinforcement from China for expressing my feelings even if I were disappointed. If I had to describe them I would say they are from the object “Diplomacy”.

I have this disposition. I know already that I diplomacy speak harsh words about China: a foreign Country. But this is just because I diplomacy made the thinking incorrect based on my diplomatic perceptions. So my comment must diplomacy limit my scope. I know that this culture China does not accept the western beliefs from Berkeley. Or if China did, there is the opening for that of a fan which over many years I still do not know of. Where is my fan? This fissure does not have a remedy because the emphasis is on the problem of a female relative to Berkeley. But it is a conditioned thinking element of culture which satisfies the requirement of unity and order. Assuming that this is just an account of sufferings and disenchantment my diplomacy would be forced to correctly establish myself as the authority to it. This counts as an explanation for me, the proceeding would have been the outcome of my own doing. This must be an activity of Chinese Culture. Thousands of years have passed, and China has a repertoire of living experiences the people can recognize. This must mean everything to China to have a living history.

Whittle away at Confucius; Shackle at his time so as not to notice the intervals.

Human Beings are meant to live a hundred years, this man counted to a thousand just to get home. The next one spends a half of his life as a helpless child or spent half in sleep. Of the time that remains, half is added to mechanisms with increased complexity. So, what remains are all the various instances a person is plagued by pain, sickness, sorrow, bitterness, deaths, losses, worry, fear, and return. In sum, six years is hardly a measure at all of time in which a person can reason without needing any chance intervals- a perception of saving.

What is man’s life for? What pleasure is there in it? Is it for beauty and riches? Is it for color? When at a time beauty and riches no longer answer the needs of the heart, and when a surfeit of colors become only a weariness to the eyes, there are only remedies of which cheat history of the usual bad outcome. Do we live for the sake of being now crowed into submission by the fear of the Law and its penalties? We waste our rational faculties in a mad scramble of emotions none of which is worthy to note. What could be called a relationship is really a hollow praise of an hour, scheming to contrive that somehow some remnant of reputation shall outlast our lives.

We safely move through the various motions, in olden times it was a narrow groove; we are preoccupied with the various instances of those formulas that work for great men. Are we brooding over our prejudices, pretending the joys of life are among us without even knowing we only use those parts which are apparently missing? Consider for a moment you have a taste of the hardy wine of freedom. Should your anxiety be relieved, nothing gnawing at you, no perception of a need; is this also the character of transparency? We are truly imprisoned as if we lay at the bottom of a dungeon, heaped with chains but trusted and full of advice.

The men of grace and context know that life comes without warning, and as suddenly goes. They denied none of their natural inclinations, and repressed none of their bodily desires. They never felt the spur of fame. They sauntered through life gathering its pleasures as the impulse moved them. They filled in the cross roads, but they cared nothing for fame. In death they all have the same qualities and they all “pull snow.”

Now spurred to frenzied action by the promise of a reward or fame, the question is: were you a Cemetery or were you a Celebrity? Thus the myriad things are equal at birth, and again become equal in death. All are equally wise, equally foolish, equally noble, equally base.

Today people live fewer years to get home, others are employed many, but they all die. The benevolent sage dies just as dead as the wicked fool. Alive they were [the sage-kings] Yao and shum; dead, they are just rotten bones. Alive they were [the cruel tyrants] Lieh and Chou; dead, they are just rotten bones. And rotten bones are all alike; who can distinguish them? Then let us make the most of these moments. Try to notice the improvements and find ways of measuring them. We have to be concerned with what those have said…. always.

The Fundamental of Confucius

Early Chinese thought was recognized on the basis of Schema. Confucius identified it. Some of the political movements since have gone the opposite way. That is the inert persons responsible for the network of ideas, always a guy, has enjoyed better times since. The culture in China has vacillating within it military and political issues; yet there is an imperative. It is nearly systemic to the cultural makeup for the reason that the object for which people can talk is the cause of complications. It is inevitable that Schema will develop from the obstacle. Going on the basis of unity or the similarity of a conditioned thinking process, the emphasis for order and unity secures Confucius will recognize the absence of it. How does one ascend into grace, or achieve immunity from the encroaching Schema. This is my idea: assuming a person is sympathetic to the Schema, society and culture as it is good or bad gets congested; it would be satisfactory to sort of delete all of the various instances of the thought; all of them all at once. I refuse to believe that Confucius would not notice the silence. So, assuming the deletion has sufficiently affected the culture, it is marked as a waking for Confucius. Even though there is little written about the philosopher, Confucius evidently appears at instances when the schema has disappeared.

Have a Good Evening

MP3 reader/player for this post.

My automatic behavior on an evening when I just want complacency was marked with two, Yep you guessed it, (2) Problems. The question is nostalgically, do you want to read about my (2) all time best problems?

The first problem is: I pray that BOB doesn’t have any children. There is this guy BOB in Texas. People have tried to be creative about him, but I know like BOB pretty much everything is creative. I have this Ice-Cream Sandwich, and I’m happy. But I know at BOB’s best he is nothing more than a Tom and Jerry Cartoon; Jerry is his Dad. Now I know you know the bible story. It is the greatest story ever told. The Bible. Well anyway there is this lady; she retained her health. Her name is Mary. I am not sure about the rest, like what she said, what she saw, or if anyone else witnessed the same thing she did. Oh, Mary had a son; I tried to tell BOB, the guy in Texas. I would say he could have been God, but now I know the Bible story. BOB, the guy in Texas, has not married lord forgiving, so I guess everything is OK. That is all, like I should know the drill; but how will there be a Kingdom within a Kingdom. I just keep getting awkward about BOB. So, I try his story the same as the one in the bible, and I just get more and more unsure. That I laugh. Like the story I tell, what I am saying each sentence ends like gish – (I’m Laughing Out Loud).

This is the other one; no less epic. “Clay Jenkinson had sex with Mary Stockinger and he paid five dollars for it.” The title is longer then the first title, “The Bible” but this one is different. This story might not turn out as generic as the first. Well, Clay returns home from the distressing event. For his parents though they knew about what he did, they could not confront him. So they had a hissy-fit. Okay, a guy does the wrong thing. Like I said he had sex with Mary Stockinger. He doesn’t remember this so you might as well put it on the back burner. But that won’t work because every time he does the presentation, I call security and have him escorted off the stage. So, really as far as a story is concerned all there is is Clay Jenkinson and a little bit of scorn from his parents over Mary.

Clay Jenkinson remembered how much his parents hurt him, so when he discovered what his parents had used, The Declaration of Independence, to show their disapproval, he committed him self to it. He doesn’t see how this was punishment for the wrong thing. And, it is probably an ethic of his parents more than a general wrong thing. But, Clay falls dreadfully short of making a connection of the street sex and his parents scorn. The scorn part is how he involved himself with Jefferson. It was The Declaration of Independence then that Clay Jenkinson became a scholar.

So, as he performs before an audience in the character of Thomas Jefferson, I gently motion him off the stage as if a Security Guard were working with someone having inappropriate behavior. Not only is he festering in the scorn of his parents, he is undermining the peace of an American Historical Figure. This is my story and I’m saying that Clay Jenkinson does not understand his interest causally. So, the performances continue. I am not sure how to describe it; it is magic. I do not want any trouble. Just for the record, I need to let you know that Thomas Jefferson had sex with an African American woman, not a prostitute.

All of these (2) Stories are reserved for a time when I want to relax and enjoy a good evening.

We’re Getting Along

I am fascinated by the Japan and China exchange.

If I had to choose between the two I would choose China. But I am just being honest about my history. Just a little more about that; I am willing to admit that Sony is a bad name as is my family name on my mother’s side: Polson. Basically the problems these two countries are going through are based on circumstances that could be explained easily just knowing that.

Yet I get just underneath the surface, and I can understand the political issues. Koizumi, who is I guess ending his political position is somewhat bitter about having not had any sons. His claim is that China has enjoyed the benefits of its culture, a rather assertive feminist disposition. I am like what? There are women in practically every facet of my life. I learned about women’s issues. Should I be defensive about my own conscience of this imbalance? I say imbalance only to the extent that I know my best ability in contrast to myself knowledge; I leave and I am good. Assuming I am leaving as predicated by my own personal substance such as a social function, the facts about me such as my self knowledge, I also expect my constituency to also have knowledge. But, to leave similarly; I do not think I would have any gain from that proceeding. It is almost as if I have fixated on something you can pull on. I am aware that to get a son, the Y is a recessive gene, you had better not pull on anything. So, yes I am leaving and everyone is quite sure it is good. I take my leave. And; I do have issues about Return; a conversation at a Convalescent Hospital. But, that will be a subject for another story.

The intended message the Prime Minister in Japan has and wants to remedy is about the Chinese ethic. I do not want to go into the mechanisms and theories about my leave, I do know for a fact my leave is not only a part of prayer, it is also a part of the body. Some guy says who writes about Adorno says the thing I am about is anthropomorphic. I take that to mean I would be in character Somatic. I would be described as weird. I don’t see it. What is it that the guy says is anthropomorphic about me? So, how does a person recover from leave? There is no remedy. Leave is the program. And, women’s issues are a point for China to receive Constructive Criticism.

So, getting back to Japan and China, there is some confusion about just exactly how they are relating. Japan is asking for China to be Transparent. I am confused about this. Is Japan hoping China will figure out how to put it in their self? Of course this is a question taking great liberty. And the return, will China be satisfied when the Feminist ethic yields cultural reform. I doubt that there will be any reform. No, everything the same; that there is an emphatic conditioning requirement expected. I am up to the task. So, what if China has been living their culture to the detriment of national success. If what China wants, and I am there to be made an example to the degree that they will get it from me, outside the box will hurt a little. And this conditioning, the process of becoming comfortable with, “Leave,” which has to take place slowly is probably appropriate for someone like me who is good with taking leave. It is an ancient culture and with the kind of time there is much to protect. If even a person were conscious of their prayer would it advance appropriately? Japan is disappointed that a person of public order couldn’t have a son. Japan says there must be change..

Now I am pretty intelligent about the order of things. This tertiary outcome, I am saying takes time and is described as conditioning, is nothing in comparison to the fact that there is a world. I stopped. There is a world. So, which is it? This really important truth that everything even our prayers ultimately provides the way for our knowledge to be reassuring? Or is there credence to a cultural assertiveness and patient understanding the better social platform. I do not think that Japan and China disagree. It just looks like Japan has the thinking for the cosmological story to proceed. And China is outside the box. Is China Disenchanted? Why do I get my mail when ever I think something is wrong here? Would China choose Yes, or No? Does China like Expressions. How about the Story of Peter Pan? Jackson Pollock, The Stone Roses, Kung Fu Hustle.

I have some updated views which will hopefully put this political message into another perspective.

Part II Deserved Attention

You know it is an effort to think rationally; but on making the thoughts on purpose is usually a little bit out of the way since really all we can expect is the possibility. So, I want to focus on a thought. How did you get that thought? Was it a thought from just before? And here it is; and, I realize that just because you made a change of focus and I’m alone and possibly in a different place I need a little context. You have changed you perspective and it makes sense to me. Oh how troubling is this given that I’m an easy mover. I guess the best way to explain is by calling it a fortress. So you know what? I don’t really care if my stability is a variance. You especially should not worry about me they are your thoughts. All I can expect is that you are rational. As we will discover by the end of this posting it will literally be about you! But now, I’ve assured people enough, and now from a management perspective I look like a risk of safety. I have given trials and tribulations; I have learned to trust my inner voice and most about my self governance I have learned to trust my feelings; about ideas I am responsible. All of this just to keep my place in line. So, there is really no surprise that I have deserved, by reassurance to those people who could apply a therapeutic outcome for me, to in fact cause me to have a therapeutic outcome.

I have the responsibility to a smaller degree that if even my father has decided that I am his rotten son, I have the honor of enjoying the benefits of a relationship with him, about which he has no idea. For my dad; there is no hiding places. Or if there is a hiding place, it is everywhere. So my thinking which you might say is your thinking, is the arrangement agreeably rational. The candid relationship with my father is a benefit requiring responsibility. I have re-assured people a lot; I have proved my place in my community even if I discern my adversaries. If you haven’t noticed I get practically every social disease imaginable; and , before that I was waking enough in a consistent sort of way to have gotten all my curtain calls. By about this time there is another level about to be exposed.

Part V Closing with the Self Doubt

I am at the point that my stories are like a Twig whose careful conditioning has caused the twig to straighten. I release them into service. Yea; I am proud. There is improvement and it has satisfied me. What again is it, am I thinking here? I am using thoughts– is this a bad trip? I am not broken; I am in Doubt. I have self doubt. And, it no-longer is about my father, or a girl that is close to me, it is about you. I am sharing. Did you realize something I could never know? And I am doubting. I doubt I could ever go the Harvard. It is a technicality. The people who go to Harvard have no need for practicality and different bits of knowledge just underneath the surface, they are people who work for success. I am astonished. Harvard students will ascend to the top of their field. And I am doubting, isn’t that great. Now you know something which I have told you, and in return I want you to make sure I never go to Harvard. You will wake those staff educators of this news because I have doubted there is a technicality which will bring controversy and shame to the various generations of Harvard Alumni. What is being asked of these few who go to Harvard is by no means of mine a concern but an issue of name. I am satisfied, I am equipped, I am in a stable context, and I hope I am not a burden for these scholars. I only doubt myself. I concede there are better ways. I ask only for forgiveness. Throughout history there have been people who are great, let me say that you are great. And it has not been always that easy to achieve greatness. Some instances have ended badly. There is treason, and crimes, and faults all are instances of how I have observed that History ends badly. I have no needs and even as I doubt myself; I forgive. It is just another chapter in time. I will rest now.
Thank you.
goodnight.

Hugh

The Piano is being Tuned

Quite Well; Thank you. I did mention ten already as In/2019m sure you know. Something like that; yes. Or else. Never mind it’s just snobbery. What was it exactly that has the therapeutic value. NO; that means finger pointing, eyebrows low, mouth shaped in the letter “O” you cannot pitch this thing. You are getting me down, this is the riddle of equal temperment. It is too late now. So? I think you are supposed to off set the local “empire builder.” Go somewhere else so it doesn’t interfere. That totaled; I am going to Portland. This is a note. Are you hearing me correctly? What was that? It’s that what got all wet. It quit! I think my Blog is getting messy. Just so I keep dry; you probably do this every day; I have to bare witness to the fact that should I relax here, I can tell you for sure there is going to be a profit. Yea baby! I would like to see that. Fewer and fewer are there for my word soup; Peddle due come from Digital? The Supreme Court gave out their prerogative; and why not this country is ruined. There is a sight of action: let the cat go! I was wondering where they wanted the King Tut thing ta go now that it was packed and gone from L.A. Just down to the middle “C” if I get all happy about a international thing like a plug or something to stop the king from killing those space invaders. I was just kind of wanting to tell you I was thinking they had a good effect. Did King Tut say anything like that? I got ta go now. I will talk to ya later. A thousand is a good amount if this is Kelly. Clearly I am using the water to get a pill down. Do you need something? Do you need help? Hang-up SVP