Pharaoh’s Discussion

I probably cannot reassure anyone unless I am held responsible for my own life and the particulars of it. I know that when Staff talks to me, they ask me to take responsibility for my life and not worry about other people in the community. During a certain time in my life I did think that my history was subject to difficulties, that I might not be the best person in regards to that authority. Though this time came to pass, I made it a policy to not hold a person responsible for the transgressions of another. This was just a policy. Had I not made that special consideration, I would have been drawn into various circumstances not having much at all to do with me or my history. We would be obligated to indict a person for a possibility that would never solve. I therefore want very much to point out that people have lots of social contact in various combinations, that no accident of the body is the responsibility of another.

There is another little technicality involving the volition (pronounced Vol-ishon) of a person who might also have a popular opinion. When in the course of the predications and directives of such great persons, there is always the danger that it has a self defeating cause. Would you continue to work on that basis? Well, yes. To do the work is good; we already know. Since the thinking is deployed rather suspiciously in that there are major ideas being said in no uncertain terms, I want to mention that we have learned this particular convention from the lessons of history. We do not question those with a stronger mind than ourselves since we might not have the endowment for as many diverse ideas.

To get that into one’s knowledge, “Those space invaders have a good effect.” If we were in the time of King Tut, would we have such an ethic? They did not think that certain “space invaders” should live on that basis. I happen to believe that all people have privileges and immunities given to them by the 14th Amendment, but in that time they did not have a government to direct their society. Shall we use conditioning to sort of weed out those parts of our society that bridge the, “mind your own business.” ethic, and then later legislate the rule of law on those whose minds carry with them that established and popular opinion? Keep in mind that we want those kinds of people in our society to be FREE and we want them to practice our traditions.

I just think that these ideas are far too advanced for my purpose: to render the possibility of the body to to itself. The later thoughts are applicable to this topic, however they are grossly undeveloped. I just need to establish that making a controversy out of an event would be a travesty to the possibility as a general idea.

There are a lot of stopping points in this discussion. But, these very important ideas have been passed over. That there are major topics mentioned, and I should refer to the text Judgment of Pharaoh; I believe the stuff in need of respectful attention is the Phenomenology.

House Announcement

The House is nearly completed. I am so happy about it that, as usual I say the quality, I want to explain a couple of things about the house.

First, it is a house for a family. The people who live at the house will make the new generation of super-fem boy art Philosopher- that kind of girl. Recall that I was one of those boys. When my childhood home was remodeled during the past year, I rescued the interesting building material that made me the way I am: and I appreciate the house I lived at during my youth. So, there is nothing to do. There will be another generation of Philosophers. The family that gets the house will age with it. The children will endure it into adulthood as I have in my family. Wow; what an order!

The other thing to mention is, why on earth would we want a house that was built by Hugh Farrell? Yes, well; I managed to recycle a very important building material. The house has that material as it’s feature. I talked to the Architect only a little bit. Based on my interaction with the Architect, the house is designed on a pluralistic concept. Think of the design as coming from two distinct ideas. Imagine that the ideas are like Foci within an Oval. There is a constraint that is maintained with the possibility of a transformation or change. That separation is distinctly a product of the house’s design.

So, please be aware that the house is announced. It is a good house. There will be developments from which we will be interested in watching.

U.S. Journalists Return

The home coming was a good way to resolve some of the changes taking place. Are things normal? Do you think that we are getting better?

The two American Journalists held captive in North Korea, Laura Ling and Euna Lee were able to return safely after being sentenced to hard labor in North Korea; thanks to the Diplomacy of former President Bill Clinton and his acquaintance. Thank you.

Older post worth a visit: Still good with Staff.

La Boeme Comment

I didn’t ever think that a couple should get divorced. I guess that divorce is the action if a couple turned out to be related in some way. The married couple might think this if they had a baby. But, I’m trying to say that things have a way of working out. So, the parents wouldn’t muse about being related on the basis of their baby, not even if the baby felt stressed out. The couple just has to live out their commitment; even if they wonder about a related issue – it will workout. And so, divorce is not needed.

La Boheme is an opera that has this as a lesson. Over the lifetime in model as the year, the exciting couple were hot and then not. There was a baby. And in the next life that couple won’t fall in love again. The reason La Boheme is an operatic-tragedy is that the audience is supposed to learn that there was a baby, and that divorce is not a remedy for real people.

So, now I’m looking at the story as it is. I want to be secure that my relationship will last through the coming year. One thing I could do for that is to be honest. I want to be known as a rational person. I know that my behavior is also a deciding factor for future success.

Still good with Staff

My visitors and readers are probably wondering about how I will make it through with these recent changes. I want to reassure my readers that I am fine. “But, we are sensitive people and there are limits to what we will find permissible.” So, I need to say that I am appropriate. We are working on our own issues. I have my inventory of the rules for correct conduct. I am not a director. I did not have a design. There is a quote that, “Success is the sum of many small efforts,” but that is probably true for lot of situations. The message here is not out of concern that my staff issues are burdensome, the message is that everybody is working on their own issues.

Would it be Okay to cite a Bible verse? I could provide a little bit of insight as to what I mean by, “everybody is working on their own issues”. Look at Deuteronomy 31:1-8. It is the major guy, Moses talking. If you have not already thought about his rein, he must have gotten the authority for the most controversial genetic issue concerning Jeff; sometimes also called Staff. Does Moses sound like he was sorry for delving into the fissure that hurts to no end? Nonetheless, Moses is making sense, and he is referring, in the form of “commandments,” to the genetic issue. Again I want to just reiterate that “everyone is working on their own issues.”

Uncle Tom’s Move-In Service

Uncle Tom is a secrete agent who possesses a remarkable talent to assist a community with reconciling the incoming personal belongings of people who are just moving into a new community. The idea is that people will pay for Uncle Tom’s Service. The classified for this business would read some similar to the following:

With Uncle Tom’s help, you could move to a new community and have all the difficulties of acceptance carefully weighted in your favor. Working in the background Uncle Tom accesses community resources for accommodations based on prerogatives that he is able to design for you in mind. The result from Uncle Tom’s Move-In Service is that you move-in with an altogether welcoming disposition amongst the community.

Uncle Tom’s Move-In service will guarantee your future stability amongst your community.
Call Uncle Tom’s Move-In Service and get it right the first time.
You could never have a grander entrance than with Uncle Tom’s Move-In Service.
Uncle Tom is the “Welcome Wagon” of the highest order!

Accommodation and community acceptance are the same idea.

1935 G-Men Synopsis

G-Men Synopsis (abridged). This movie airs on TCM at not currently scheduled of that date. This movie is a directive for Jeff. The purpose of the movie is to advocate for Jeff.
James Cagney as “Brick” Davis becomes a Government man. As an attorney sponsored by a mob leader named McKay, Brick feels he should take the place of his law school friend who was shot. Doing so meant joining the Justice Dept in his place. Before leaving for the Bureau Training in Washington, Brick says goodbye to McKay, who he learns is Retiring, and to Jean Morgan, a singer in McKay’s nightclub.

The Agency training went pretty rough for Brick. He doesn’t get along with his boss Jeff McCord. Brick earns the respect of Hugh Farrell, already a Government man. Jeff McCord’s sister Kay is seen around the Bureau and eventually moves to Chicago to be a nurse.

Two issues bring controversy to Brick’s training in Forensics at the Bureau Office. Brick identifies one of McKay’s gangsters, Danny Leggett in a bank robbery as evidence by his insignia Gardenia Flower at the crime scene. Later it was found the riffle used in the bank robbery was the same one that killed his Law School room-mate. This was Bricks trigger, but Jeff refuses to put him on the Leggett case. Appealing to the Chief (Frank Shannon), Brick is denied the case and is expected to continue his training. Also, Brick is questioned about his gang leader friend who paid for his Law School. Though there are controversial issues, Brick Davis is allowed to continue training at the Justice Department.

Jeff McCord gives the bank robbery case to Hugh Farrell. After apprehending Leggett, Farrell is killed along with three other police officers in a gangster shoot out at the Chicago Station. The FBI chief (Frank Shannon) asks for Federal Laws arming G-Men with guns. Jeff McCord and Brick Davis go to Chicago. Anticipating the next crime spree from the Chicago Office, Brick is visited by the night club singer Jean. After inquiry, Brick learns that all the gangsters have gone to McKay’s retirement lodge. Brick also learns Jean married Brad Collins another gangster.

When the G-men arrive at McKay’s Lodge, Legislation has passed giving Government agents Federal Laws allowing them to carry guns. There is a shoot out and ex-gang leader McKay gets killed. Brad Collins the last of the gang makes a get away. He calls on his wife Jean. Brick follows up on Jean, and gets wounded by Collins. After Brick is hospitalized, Collins kidnaps Jeff’s nurse sister, and makes his hideout at the garage. Jean phones Brick with Brad Collins’ location at the garage and she is shot by her husband Collins for phoning his location. Brick leaves the Hospital in a hurry to save Jean. Shot my Collins, Jean sees Brick just before she dies. She says, “There’s no reason a G-Man couldn’t kiss an old friend.” With Jean’s information, Brick shoots Collins, and rescues Jeff’s sister Kay. Brick and Kay agree to get married and Jeff closes the movie with a smile of satisfaction.

Perfume 10

My Important Audio Message about Perfume

Other Links to the study of Smells such as Categories of Odor Intensity

Revised Allegory

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 at Wikipedia

ADA Official Web site

Disability is defined as “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity.”

This is the wide ranged Law that has captured the public conscience since the Civil Rights Act of 1963. The way into this philosophy is to develop your reading comprehension with an emphasis on the notion of accommodation. Thus focused this Law unpacks as revolutionary hinging on Communism. Creed is dwarfed by this Law. And, to an extent that we are differentiating specific qualities of Mental Illness, our governing bodies are literally buried in it’s silhouette.

List of items for revision (Oct. 2009):
African American’s use the tidy.
Somebody had thinking during an earthquake.
Female and woman’s issues: managing difficulties.

JR Son Brendan

In 2009 while working for a counseling place in Westlake Brendan visited my board and care many times. One day he was wearing a lot of Perfume and came into my apartment. I could smell the perfume as his potency had infected the milieu. I told him not to come any closer. I said ardently not to come in my living place. I was trying to defend place because I don’t like perfume. I didn’t want a strong perfume smell in my home.

Brendan, at some point stopped, paused for a bit, tilted his head to one side, and took my apartment anyway. I could imagine that he thought himself as a staff person and that he had a right to enter my place. That was a mistake. I yelled over the violation. There was a scene in the milieu over the uproar. We did not meet, though Brendan maintains that he was scared over this. Even though he may have had a special message in mind about the perfume he was wearing, he did not get my permission to bring it in my apartment.

I think Brendan doesn’t work for the counseling place anymore; though the reason for that probably isn’t related to my trouble. What he did was he cremated a very important ancestor in my family on May 14, 2009. My father has a big belly and this important ancestor may have been his anchor. Is my father a floater?

I reasoned that I lost my major ancestor on May 14, 2009 from this situation.