Creative Context for “They Like”

To add more depth to your project beyond the simple concept of “they like,” consider these three “sub-genres” of couples portraiture:

The “Linger”: Focuses on the quiet moments—the way a hand lingers on a waist or a gaze stays a second too long. This explores the patience of a relationship.
The “Kinship”: Focuses on the couple as a foundational unit of a family. This explores protection and the shared responsibility of bringing new life into the world.
The “Mirror”: Focuses on how the couple has grown to look or act like one another over time. This explores the symmetry of long-term affection.

Using a Model Release ensures that as you explore deeper, more intimate themes, the “right to privacy” is respected through a clear, mutual agreement.

Couples Portraiture

The Architecture of Connection: A Collaborative Invitation

Photography is an exploration of how light and frame reconcile our transient lives with a lasting structural integrity. I am developing a project focused on the “Culture” of connection, specifically through portraits of couples.

The Invitation: I am looking for couples who wish to have their bond documented as a “permanent visual anchor.” If you have a portrait that represents the creative spirit of your partnership, I invite you to share it for inclusion in this study of relational architecture. Ask this question: Would it be good for you if I had your picture as a couple?

The Principles of the Project:

Privacy as Priority: I respect the sanctity of the couple and the family. Your image is held in a “common area” of study, never to be used in a way that disrupts your privacy.
The Role of the Advocate: My goal is to marry form with function, celebrating the “splendor” (Dzi) of your connection.
Agency: Sharing your image is an act of voluntary contribution to a collective rendering of what a couple can become. You are the architects; I am merely the witness.

By participating, you help clarify the “singular architecture” that thrives when two people find each other.

This is a highly thought out directive. I want to be an ontological witness. Send your picture to gevluef@gmail.com

Leviathan: A Disabled Person

I have to draw the line AI has made. From earlier Blog posts, I have identified a bad book from 2018. My plan is to give the bad book to a handicapped person. This is my Rational Survival Strategy. The bad book is a threat.

I have concluded Thomas Hobbes’ “ruler” has to be a disabled person. That narrows the span of possible rulers. If I name a disabled person, what about disability is protecting me? A question that needs an answer as I give up my rights to the “One.” Are they protecting me from getting killed?

The conclusion in Philosophy is to make the Hobbesian “ruler” out of a person with a disability. I want that person to learn about me from the bad book?

Leviathan is a disabled person!

Comment: March 19, 2026; Does this Thomas Hobbes Leviathan book belong to a staff person who is dealing with the handicapped?

Power Point Fair Money

Advance Directive Topic New 2026

I am pleased to announce the New Revised Advance Directive Worksheet for 2026

New Revised Advance Directive Worksheet 2026

Frosty The Snowman

Modes of Alan Greenspan

This is the contents of my writings about Alan Greenspan. It is for reference to the October 10th date. I ordered the government to make the money fair; with the president in the middle of the bills like the dollar.

1. Old enough for golden money: https://gevluef.com/2022/06/05/alan-greenspan-problem/

2. Billing for the Chicken Pox vaccine 1988: https://gevluef.com/2022/06/05/chickenpox-citation/ https://gevluef.com/2017/02/15/a-question-about-my-history/ https://gevluef.com/2012/06/12/chicken-pox/

3. Passport with Money at home: https://gevluef.com/2022/07/24/alan-greenspan-problem-2/

Alan Greenspan video: https://gevluef.com/2023/03/29/problem-alan-greenspan/

Staff Management Gun

Although the Downsiders story is based on a Picture 2(d) since 1988, there has become a real gun since 2001. It is part of my body (Serzone). It’s a safe gun though. The Firing pin was removed June 2022.

Gevluef search link for Gevluef on wordpress.com search “Gun.”
https://gevluef.wordpress.com/?s=gun

Sending it to the USPS for the Downsiders purpose of getting a gun is my best plan

This just says that the Downsiders’ purpose is to get a gun. That is the first directive in the Downsiders story. So, obviously the Seattle USPS needs to get a gun; that I have. I have satisfied this first directive of the Downsiders for the Post Office. They have my gun. This opens up a span of possibilities. The Post Office can work with the rest of the story having this first directive satisfied.

We tried keeping the Downsiders’ original Compact Disc at the Camarillo Post Office. It didn’t work out. So, as of now the Disc is at the Seattle USPS. They also have an accessible copy of the Compact Disc as well as the original in the 5144 packaging.

The final chapter in this saga is to work on the gun’s history. That’s G-men 1935. The movie is announcing that federal agents will be carrying guns. That was a law in 1935. The key to the movie is for Jeff to change his name to Hugh Farrell. I wrote a synopsis on the 1935 movie here at Gevluef: https://gevluef.com/2009/06/06/1935-g-men-synopsis/

Devitt with a Girlfriend

I gave a girl access to my family. I gave her a Picture Postcard of a Lotus flower for Beauty, Strength, and Purity. It was from me. It was a firewall. I gave her access because my name explains how she is doing emotionally.

On May 17, 2025, she gave us a group where she told me and my family no. She didn’t like my name. She listed Safe/Unsafe feelings; see the AI word Doc. She told my whole family no. She has the right to say no. But, privacy rules applied she probably can’t give out my name to others. I want to write to my family about what happened in that group. She clearly said no to us. I recognized that. This is not one of those times a person needs to realize Pi. I was careful to make sure Pi was available for the name.

For my family, Pi is necessary. I know something about it. She is experiencing Pi. I need to tell her to try and do something with Pi; go to Seattle.

An engagement is a social process. I appreciated her directly telling me no. She broke our engagement honestly. I respect that. I am going forward with healthy boundaries.