Category: Politics

I am a politically conscious person who’s basic philosophy is to wait. That is not very political however.

1935 G-Men Synopsis

G-Men Synopsis (abridged). This movie airs on TCM at not currently scheduled of that date. This movie is a directive for Jeff. The purpose of the movie is to advocate for Jeff.
James Cagney as “Brick” Davis becomes a Government man. As an attorney sponsored by a mob leader named McKay, Brick feels he should take the place of his law school friend who was shot. Doing so meant joining the Justice Dept in his place. Before leaving for the Bureau Training in Washington, Brick says goodbye to McKay, who he learns is Retiring, and to Jean Morgan, a singer in McKay’s nightclub.

The Agency training went pretty rough for Brick. He doesn’t get along with his boss Jeff McCord. Brick earns the respect of Hugh Farrell, already a Government man. Jeff McCord’s sister Kay is seen around the Bureau and eventually moves to Chicago to be a nurse.

Two issues bring controversy to Brick’s training in Forensics at the Bureau Office. Brick identifies one of McKay’s gangsters, Danny Leggett in a bank robbery as evidence by his insignia Gardenia Flower at the crime scene. Later it was found the riffle used in the bank robbery was the same one that killed his Law School room-mate. This was Bricks trigger, but Jeff refuses to put him on the Leggett case. Appealing to the Chief (Frank Shannon), Brick is denied the case and is expected to continue his training. Also, Brick is questioned about his gang leader friend who paid for his Law School. Though there are controversial issues, Brick Davis is allowed to continue training at the Justice Department.

Jeff McCord gives the bank robbery case to Hugh Farrell. After apprehending Leggett, Farrell is killed along with three other police officers in a gangster shoot out at the Chicago Station. The FBI chief (Frank Shannon) asks for Federal Laws arming G-Men with guns. Jeff McCord and Brick Davis go to Chicago. Anticipating the next crime spree from the Chicago Office, Brick is visited by the night club singer Jean. After inquiry, Brick learns that all the gangsters have gone to McKay’s retirement lodge. Brick also learns Jean married Brad Collins another gangster.

When the G-men arrive at McKay’s Lodge, Legislation has passed giving Government agents Federal Laws allowing them to carry guns. There is a shoot out and ex-gang leader McKay gets killed. Brad Collins the last of the gang makes a get away. He calls on his wife Jean. Brick follows up on Jean, and gets wounded by Collins. After Brick is hospitalized, Collins kidnaps Jeff’s nurse sister, and makes his hideout at the garage. Jean phones Brick with Brad Collins’ location at the garage and she is shot by her husband Collins for phoning his location. Brick leaves the Hospital in a hurry to save Jean. Shot my Collins, Jean sees Brick just before she dies. She says, “There’s no reason a G-Man couldn’t kiss an old friend.” With Jean’s information, Brick shoots Collins, and rescues Jeff’s sister Kay. Brick and Kay agree to get married and Jeff closes the movie with a smile of satisfaction.

Revised Allegory

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 at Wikipedia

ADA Official Web site

Disability is defined as “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity.”

This is the wide ranged Law that has captured the public conscience since the Civil Rights Act of 1963.  The way into this philosophy is to develop your reading comprehension with an emphasis on the notion of accommodation.  Thus focused this Law unpacks as revolutionary hinging on Communism. Creed is dwarfed by this Law. And, to an extent that we are differentiating specific qualities of Mental Illness, our governing bodies are literally buried in it’s silhouette.

List of items for revision (Oct. 2009):
African American’s use the tidy.
Somebody had thinking during an earthquake.
Female and woman’s issues: managing difficulties.

JR Son Brendan

In 2009 while working for a counseling place in Westlake Brendan visited my board and care many times. One day he was wearing a lot of Perfume and came into my apartment. I could smell the perfume as his potency had infected the milieu. I told him not to come any closer. I said ardently not to come in my living place. I was trying to defend place because I don’t like perfume. I didn’t want a strong perfume smell in my home.

Brendan, at some point stopped, paused for a bit, tilted his head to one side, and took my apartment anyway. I could imagine that he thought himself as a staff person and that he had a right to enter my place. That was a mistake. I yelled over the violation. There was a scene in the milieu over the uproar. We did not meet, though Brendan maintains that he was scared over this. Even though he may have had a special message in mind about the perfume he was wearing, he did not get my permission to bring it in my apartment.

I think Brendan doesn’t work for the counseling place anymore; though the reason for that probably isn’t related to my trouble. What he did was he cremated a very important ancestor in my family on May 14, 2009. My father has a big belly and this important ancestor may have been his anchor. Is my father a floater?

I reasoned that I lost my major ancestor on May 14, 2009 from this situation.

Invitation to Faith

For those readers who have just tuned in at Gevluef, I am writing for my upcoming Baptism in April 2009.  The baptism has captured my full attention since the December 11, 2008 announcement.  Everything since has been about how important the Sacramental Rites are to the development of Religious Faith.  I am not going to evangelize for you now, I just want to mention how it’s going.

I am entered into the Book of Election.  In the Rite of Election, I declared my commitment to the Catholic Church by the inscription of my name in a Book of Elect.  As an official elect, I will be eligible to practice Catholic traditions such as the Nicene Creed, Eucharist Responsorial, and Community activities among other stewards of Faith. I want to discover the Religious Practices as they have been for all of Time.  And so I want to celebrate my faith in God, and help the Church to do the business of Religion.  I sincerely wish to serve my community by recognizing the presence of God in all human beings.

Comments Topic II

I am a man. I am proud of my Blog. I make personal contact with my people. I know that I haven’t any comments, but if you met an elder man who was over his time and you felt the need to comment, wouldn’t he just say, “leave me alone!”

I think my readers, and they are few, visit for personal reasons. So, I maintain that I am not a Business; and, that should comments be necessary, my writing would be much different.

The main point is that I deliver in my Blog, “Personal Content” that has meaning for people who know me. Since I am a Semi-Public person, this place is probably perfect for people to see how Hugh Farrell is doing.

I have written more on the Comments Topic in the past. However, if this lack of comments has been difficult to reconcile try looking at the Bible verse: (Second Colossians 3:1-8, 9, 12-17).

Follicle

From Arles, Vincent van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo: “I am seeing a lot of new things here. I am learning, and my body, if treated with a little kindness, serves me well.”

Theo was probably expected to have some knowledge. As an artist, Vincent toiled amongst his paintings. Elaborate charges against Vincent are all that is expected from Theo. And so…

The basic assumption is that a difficult Question has been asked.
You are struggling with one of the most important of humanities. Unfortunately nowhere in Philosophy or Religion can this be learned since there is no place willing or accommodating. If someone failed to convince you they know what you are asking, would you impose on them your answer? I should not have commented, or else I must forgive a person whose transgressions have advanced and whose answer is possible. This is not my discussion because I have not asked the questions. After careful meditation, I have concluded, particularly, that there is some solution a Prior to this possibility.

Then should we thus maintain those whose transgressions must be forgiven as the rank-n-file for an answer, or should we have them as steady but nourishing components of the way?

Vincent van Gogh
Arles, June 1888
Oil on Canvas, 73 x 92.5 cm
F 425, JH 1442
Otterlo, Rijksmuseum Kroller-Muller.

Image Citation:
Walther, Ingo, and Rainer Metzger. Vincent van Gogh: The Complete Paintings, Volume II. Trans. Michael Hulse. Oldenburg, Germany: Benedikt Taschen, 1990.

Comments to XVR

There is some question as to just what is the XVR page.  Some visitors are wondering about the situation.  I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral.  So, let us take a survey of the situation.

First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed.  That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications.  Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature.  That should be a Huzza for Hume!!

Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty.  And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being.  Familiar? Yes.  Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology.  At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine.  I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY.  So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion.  And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome.  A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.

From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character.  I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy.  I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time.  He refused his award.  I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance.  Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne.  And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious.  Is it a “Pay Stub?”

The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers.  I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone.  I am not going to worry about it.  I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.