Disability is defined as “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity.”

This is the wide ranged Law that has captured the public conscience since the Civil Rights Act of 1963. The way into this philosophy is to develop your reading comprehension with an emphasis on the notion of accommodation. Thus focused this Law unpacks as revolutionary hinging on Communism. Creed is dwarfed by this Law. And, to an extent that we are differentiating specific qualities of Mental Illness, our governing bodies are literally buried in it’s silhouette.

List of items for revision (Oct. 2009):
African American’s use the tidy.
Somebody had thinking during an earthquake.
Female and woman’s issues: managing difficulties.

JR Son Brendan

In 2009 while working for a counseling place in Westlake Brendan visited my board and care many times. One day he was wearing a lot of Perfume and came into my apartment. I could smell the perfume as his potency had infected the milieu. I told him not to come any closer. I said ardently not to come in my living place. I was trying to defend place because I don’t like perfume. I didn’t want a strong perfume smell in my home.

Brendan, at some point stopped, paused for a bit, tilted his head to one side, and took my apartment anyway. I could imagine that he thought himself as a staff person and that he had a right to enter my place. That was a mistake. I yelled over the violation. There was a scene in the milieu over the uproar. We did not meet, though Brendan maintains that he was scared over this. Even though he may have had a special message in mind about the perfume he was wearing, he did not get my permission to bring it in my apartment.

I think Brendan doesn’t work for the counseling place anymore; though the reason for that probably isn’t related to my trouble. What he did was he cremated a very important ancestor in my family on May 14, 2009. My father has a big belly and this important ancestor may have been his anchor. Is my father a floater?

I reasoned that I lost my major ancestor on May 14, 2009 from this situation.

OTC Pictures and more

Oxnard Transportation Center

Invitation to Faith

For those readers who have just tuned in at Gevluef, I am writing for my upcoming Baptism in April 2009. The baptism has captured my full attention since the December 11, 2008 announcement. Everything since has been about how important the Sacramental Rites are to the development of Religious Faith. I am not going to evangelize for you now, I just want to mention how it’s going.

I am entered into the Book of Election. In the Rite of Election, I declared my commitment to the Catholic Church by the inscription of my name in a Book of Elect. As an official elect, I will be eligible to practice Catholic traditions such as the Nicene Creed, Eucharist Responsorial, and Community activities among other stewards of Faith. I want to discover the Religious Practices as they have been for all of Time. And so I want to celebrate my faith in God, and help the Church to do the business of Religion. I sincerely wish to serve my community by recognizing the presence of God in all human beings.

Comments Topic II

I am a man. I am proud of my Blog. I make personal contact with my people. I know that I haven’t any comments, but if you met an elder man who was over his time and you felt the need to comment, wouldn’t he just say, “leave me alone!”

I think my readers, and they are few, visit for personal reasons. So, I maintain that I am not a Business; and, that should comments be necessary, my writing would be much different.

The main point is that I deliver in my Blog, “Personal Content” that has meaning for people who know me. Since I am a Semi-Public person, this place is probably perfect for people to see how Hugh Farrell is doing.

I have written more on the Comments Topic in the past. However, if this lack of comments has been difficult to reconcile try looking at the Bible verse: (Second Colossians 3:1-8, 9, 12-17).

Bricks Study

NORMAL VIEW

ALAN GREENSPAN’S VIEW

Follicle

From Arles, Vincent van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo: “I am seeing a lot of new things here. I am learning, and my body, if treated with a little kindness, serves me well.”

Theo was probably expected to have some knowledge. As an artist, Vincent toiled amongst his paintings. Elaborate charges against Vincent are all that is expected from Theo. And so…

The basic assumption is that a difficult Question has been asked.
You are struggling with one of the most important of humanities. Unfortunately nowhere in Philosophy or Religion can this be learned since there is no place willing or accommodating. If someone failed to convince you they know what you are asking, would you impose on them your answer? I should not have commented, or else I must forgive a person whose transgressions have advanced and whose answer is possible. This is not my discussion because I have not asked the questions. After careful meditation, I have concluded, particularly, that there is some solution a Prior to this possibility.

Then should we thus maintain those whose transgressions must be forgiven as the rank-n-file for an answer, or should we have them as steady but nourishing components of the way?

Vincent van Gogh
Arles, June 1888
Oil on Canvas, 73 x 92.5 cm
F 425, JH 1442
Otterlo, Rijksmuseum Kroller-Muller.

Image Citation:
Walther, Ingo, and Rainer Metzger. Vincent van Gogh: The Complete Paintings, Volume II. Trans. Michael Hulse. Oldenburg, Germany: Benedikt Taschen, 1990.

Comments to XVR

There is some question as to just what is the XVR page. Some visitors are wondering about the situation. I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral. So, let us take a survey of the situation.

First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed. That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications. Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature. That should be a Huzza for Hume!!

Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty. And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being. Familiar? Yes. Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology. At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine. I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY. So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion. And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome. A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.

From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character. I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy. I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time. He refused his award. I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance. Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne. And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious. Is it a “Pay Stub?”

The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers. I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone. I am not going to worry about it. I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.

Time; October 19, 2007

I want to mention Lyndon B. Johnson again. I just said that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a question. That isn’t really fair. Firstly though I did believe that Lyndon B. Johnson may have approved the Act for everyone to go to Purgatory, but I think that there is much more to say about that time. So, in the interest of fairness I will mention a few other things. Let’s not forget that this president enacted more programs for the benefit of the people than any other President. He was truely the Education President.

In my opinion, the trouble started after February 28, 1958. I was not born then however I have read, “A Generation in Motion; Popular Music and Culture in the Sixties,” by David Pichaske. This book was most helpful for me since the circumstance of that date has caused Lyndon Johnson a lot of anguish.

So anyway, I think Lyndon Johnson is contrary to public opinion. That is my belief based on the Viet Nam War. It is my belief because I was born in 1968. This was a Time of a troubled nation. It is no surprise that I have that as part of my history. Now I will tell you I have a lot of problems that go unnoticed. You wouldn’t think what I just said was anything much at all, but this is my circumstance. I have a lot of problems that go unnoticed because I’m contrary to public opinion. I am helpful, I just know that I get problems and it’s hard to know that I am needed. It is probably best I should just follow my own interests without too much intervention.

I’ve often mused that it would be better to be in agreement with myself.

A nice man’s story

Read My Comments: 1. Cavity 2. Expensive

I will empower, indemnify, and uncover the meaning of these words. It all started when a terrible man coveted me to the extent I could not manage my social affairs. After nine years his musings became like music to me. I was unique and I learned his language. If you want to know what it is like to have your own corner of world to live in, perhaps you could bare with me to see what meaning is in store for just two words. I know you are asking why I should expose a man by sharing, when it is clear I like his language has he has imposed on me. I became a great story teller. The man has passed away. The insight no less important has disappeared. The two words openly deployed before you had meaning to me and the man. If I do not tell, they will be lost words. I am alerted they have already fallen from my highest esteem with his passing.

I need not point out the need for improvement in the dental hygiene area. I think the problem started early in 2003 when I became the subject of a campaign of hate and scorn from my dental clinic. My factual information was coalesced with scant biographical information. It was disseminated anonymously by California’s Western Dental. A billing office located in Orange County was identified as the culprit.

Basically after a year I managed to stop them from sending the email; all I had to do was acknowledge them. I have found that quite generally I often discern my adversary. This often includes a certain directive which in this case I had satisfied by the year’s end.

The next word: Expensive. I am at a loss as to exactly what the meaning was. My intuition tells me I had been excited about something which was neither true nor measurable and which lead to an associatively deeper sort of truth. It was an idea that never came to fruition and still reinforced a person to accept it on emotional grounds. Of course I recall it (Expensive is another way to explain a need for an integral). This must have been what I did to recognize Western Dental’s directive. My name had become Hugh Farrell. I reasoned these people without quite knowing what was required, had placed great importance on their information about me. I must have navigated through my process and resolved their directive as one of my accomplishments. This must have been in agreement with a fundamental premise of the Dental Clinic with the name Western Dental. Even in the situation where I am compromised from their having given out my information I am still willing to give them a start; “Where would you go if you had a cavity?”

Category: Politics

Revised Allegory