Category: Politics

I am a politically conscious person who’s basic philosophy is to wait. That is not very political however.

Invitation to Faith

For those readers who have just tuned in at Gevluef, I am writing for my upcoming Baptism in April 2009.  The baptism has captured my full attention since the December 11, 2008 announcement.  Everything since has been about how important the Sacramental Rites are to the development of Religious Faith.  I am not going to evangelize for you now, I just want to mention how it’s going.

I am entered into the Book of Election.  In the Rite of Election, I declared my commitment to the Catholic Church by the inscription of my name in a Book of Elect.  As an official elect, I will be eligible to practice Catholic traditions such as the Nicene Creed, Eucharist Responsorial, and Community activities among other stewards of Faith. I want to discover the Religious Practices as they have been for all of Time.  And so I want to celebrate my faith in God, and help the Church to do the business of Religion.  I sincerely wish to serve my community by recognizing the presence of God in all human beings.

Comments Topic II

I am a man. I am proud of my Blog. I make personal contact with my people. I know that I haven’t any comments, but if you met an elder man who was over his time and you felt the need to comment, wouldn’t he just say, “leave me alone!”

I think my readers, and they are few, visit for personal reasons. So, I maintain that I am not a Business; and, that should comments be necessary, my writing would be much different.

The main point is that I deliver in my Blog, “Personal Content” that has meaning for people who know me. Since I am a Semi-Public person, this place is probably perfect for people to see how Hugh Farrell is doing.

I have written more on the Comments Topic in the past. However, if this lack of comments has been difficult to reconcile try looking at the Bible verse: (Second Colossians 3:1-8, 9, 12-17).

Follicle

From Arles, Vincent van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo: “I am seeing a lot of new things here. I am learning, and my body, if treated with a little kindness, serves me well.”

Theo was probably expected to have some knowledge. As an artist, Vincent toiled amongst his paintings. Elaborate charges against Vincent are all that is expected from Theo. And so…

The basic assumption is that a difficult Question has been asked.
You are struggling with one of the most important of humanities. Unfortunately nowhere in Philosophy or Religion can this be learned since there is no place willing or accommodating. If someone failed to convince you they know what you are asking, would you impose on them your answer? I should not have commented, or else I must forgive a person whose transgressions have advanced and whose answer is possible. This is not my discussion because I have not asked the questions. After careful meditation, I have concluded, particularly, that there is some solution a Prior to this possibility.

Then should we thus maintain those whose transgressions must be forgiven as the rank-n-file for an answer, or should we have them as steady but nourishing components of the way?

Vincent van Gogh
Arles, June 1888
Oil on Canvas, 73 x 92.5 cm
F 425, JH 1442
Otterlo, Rijksmuseum Kroller-Muller.

Image Citation:
Walther, Ingo, and Rainer Metzger. Vincent van Gogh: The Complete Paintings, Volume II. Trans. Michael Hulse. Oldenburg, Germany: Benedikt Taschen, 1990.

Comments to XVR

There is some question as to just what is the XVR page.  Some visitors are wondering about the situation.  I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral.  So, let us take a survey of the situation.

First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed.  That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications.  Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature.  That should be a Huzza for Hume!!

Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty.  And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being.  Familiar? Yes.  Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology.  At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine.  I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY.  So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion.  And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome.  A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.

From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character.  I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy.  I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time.  He refused his award.  I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance.  Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne.  And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious.  Is it a “Pay Stub?”

The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers.  I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone.  I am not going to worry about it.  I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.

Time; October 19, 2007

I want to mention Lyndon B. Johnson again.  I just said that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a question.  That isn’t really fair.  Firstly though I did believe that Lyndon B. Johnson may have approved the Act for everyone to go to Purgatory, but I think that there is much more to say about that time.  So, in the interest of fairness I will mention a few other things.  Let’s not forget that this president enacted more programs for the benefit of the people than any other President.  He was truely the Education President.

In my opinion, the trouble started after February 28, 1958.  I was not born then however I have read, “A Generation in Motion; Popular Music and Culture in the Sixties,” by David Pichaske.  This book was most helpful for me since the circumstance of that date has caused Lyndon Johnson a lot of anguish.

So anyway, I think Lyndon Johnson is contrary to public opinion.  That is my belief based on the Viet Nam War. It is my belief because I was born in 1968.  This was a Time of a troubled nation.  It is no surprise that I have that as part of my history.  Now I will tell you I have a lot of problems that go unnoticed.  You wouldn’t think what I just said was anything much at all, but this is my circumstance.  I have a lot of problems that go unnoticed because I’m contrary to public opinion.  I am helpful, I just know that I get problems and it’s hard to know that I am needed.  It is probably best I should just follow my own interests without too much intervention.

I’ve often mused that it would be better to be in agreement with myself.

A nice man’s story

Read My Comments:  1. Cavity   2. Expensive

I will empower, indemnify, and uncover the meaning of these words.  It all started when a terrible man coveted me to the extent I could not manage my social affairs.  After nine years his musings became like music to me.  I was unique and I learned his language.  If you want to know what it is like to have your own corner of world to live in, perhaps you could bare with me to see what meaning is in store for just two words.  I know you are asking why I should expose a man by sharing, when it is clear I like his language has he has imposed on me.  I became a great story teller.  The man has passed away.  The insight no less important has disappeared.  The two words openly deployed before you had meaning to me and the man.  If I do not tell, they will be lost words.  I am alerted they have already fallen from my highest esteem with his passing.

I need not point out the need for improvement in the dental hygiene area.  I think the problem started early in 2003 when I became the subject of a campaign of hate and scorn from my dental clinic.  My factual information was coalesced with scant biographical information.  It was disseminated anonymously by California’s Western Dental.  A billing office located in Orange County was identified as the culprit.

Basically after a year I managed to stop them from sending the email; all I had to do was acknowledge them.  I have found that quite generally I often discern my adversary.  This often includes a certain directive which in this case I had satisfied by the year’s end.

The next word: Expensive.  I am at a loss as to exactly what the meaning was.  My intuition tells me I had been excited about something which was neither true nor measurable and which lead to an associatively deeper sort of truth.  It was an idea that never came to fruition and still reinforced a person to accept it on emotional grounds.  Of course I recall it (Expensive is another way to explain a need for an integral).  This must have been what I did to recognize Western Dental’s directive.  My name had become Hugh Farrell.  I reasoned these people without quite knowing what was required, had placed great importance on their information about me.  I must have navigated through my process and resolved their directive as one of my accomplishments.  This must have been in agreement with a fundamental premise of the Dental Clinic with the name Western Dental.  Even in the situation where I am compromised from their having given out my information I am still willing to give them a start; “Where would you go if you had a cavity?”

The Fundamental of Confucius

Early Chinese thought was recognized on the basis of Schema.  Confucius identified it.  Some of the political movements since have gone the opposite way.  That is the inert persons responsible for the network of ideas, always a guy, has enjoyed better times since. The culture in China has vacillating within it military and political issues; yet there is an imperative.  It is nearly systemic to the cultural makeup for the reason that the object for which people can talk is the cause of complications. It is inevitable that Schema will develop from the obstacle. Going on the basis of unity or the similarity of a conditioned thinking process, the emphasis for order and unity secures Confucius will recognize the absence of it.  How does one ascend into grace, or achieve immunity from the encroaching Schema.  This is my idea: assuming a person is sympathetic to the Schema, society and culture as it is good or bad gets congested; it would be satisfactory to sort of delete all of the various instances of the thought; all of them all at once.  I refuse to believe that Confucius would not notice the silence. So, assuming the deletion has sufficiently affected the culture, it is marked as a waking for Confucius.  Even though there is little written about the philosopher, Confucius evidently appears at instances when the schema has disappeared.

Have a Good Evening

Have a Good Evening

MP3 reader/player for this post.

My automatic behavior on an evening when I just want complacency was marked with two, Yep you guessed it, (2) Problems.  The question is nostalgically, do you want to read about my (2) all time best problems?

The first problem is: I pray that BOB doesn’t have any children.  There is this guy BOB in Texas. People have tried to be creative about him, but I know like BOB pretty much everything is creative.  I have this Ice-Cream Sandwich, and I’m happy.  But I know at BOB’s best he is nothing more than a Tom and Jerry Cartoon; Jerry is his Dad.  Now I know you know the bible story.  It is the greatest story ever told. The Bible.  Well anyway there is this lady; she retained her health.  Her name is Mary.  I am not sure about the rest, like what she said, what she saw, or if anyone else witnessed the same thing she did.  Oh, Mary had a son; I tried to tell BOB, the guy in Texas.  I would say he could have been God, but now I know the Bible story.  BOB, the guy in Texas, has not married lord forgiving, so I guess everything is OK.  That is all, like I should know the drill; but how will there be a Kingdom within a Kingdom.  I just keep getting awkward about BOB.  So, I try his story the same as the one in the bible, and I just get more and more unsure.  That I laugh. Like the story I tell, what I am saying each sentence ends like gish – (I’m Laughing Out Loud).

This is the other one; no less epic.  “Clay Jenkinson had sex with Mary Stockinger and he paid five dollars for it.”  The title is longer then the first title, “The Bible” but this one is different.  This story might not turn out as generic as the first.  Well, Clay returns home from the distressing event. For his parents though they knew about what he did, they could not confront him. So they had a hissy-fit.  Okay, a guy does the wrong thing. Like I said he had sex with Mary Stockinger.  He doesn’t remember this so you might as well put it on the back burner. But that won’t work because every time he does the presentation, I call security and have him escorted off the stage. So, really as far as a story is concerned all there is is Clay Jenkinson and a little bit of scorn from his parents over Mary.

Clay Jenkinson remembered how much his parents hurt him, so when he discovered what his parents had used, The Declaration of Independence, to show their disapproval, he committed him self to it. He doesn’t see how this was punishment for the wrong thing. And, it is probably an ethic of his parents more than a general wrong thing. But, Clay falls dreadfully short of making a connection of the street sex and his parents scorn. The scorn part is how he involved himself with Jefferson. It was The Declaration of Independence then that Clay Jenkinson became a scholar.

So, as he performs before an audience in the character of Thomas Jefferson, I gently motion him off the stage as if a Security Guard were working with someone having inappropriate behavior. Not only is he festering in the scorn of his parents, he is undermining the peace of an American Historical Figure. This is my story and I’m saying that Clay Jenkinson does not understand his interest causally. So, the performances continue.  I am not sure how to describe it; it is magic.  I do not want any trouble.  Just for the record, I need to let you know that Thomas Jefferson had sex with an African American woman, not a prostitute.

All of these (2) Stories are reserved for a time when I want to relax and enjoy a good evening.