Last Christmas Purchase

The Casher produces the total dollar amount due for the Customer’s selections of products to purchase. Please observe the reasons you get the stuff at the store and not any cash paid.

Are there any “reasons” the Customer would need to provide while checking out? Perhaps the VISA Card was used in the transaction and reasons were needed. The Customer engaged in thievery! Just because you have a VISA Card doesn’t mean that you have a right to take things. There are lots of people out there who devote much of their time to reconciling the last Christmas purchase.

The Customer promised to go to Church on Sunday, confess their sins, and do pentenance for getting the store items for free. I have been forgiven for my sins in Baptism by the Church. I speak the universal language of GOD; a product of the Church. GOD is the Churches best product. I have a Church that attends to my Religious needs. And, I believe in one GOD. It is a GOD as I understand it.

In the last Christmas purchase example, was there any Cash used in the transaction? And, so it is in good faith for all debts public and private that this particular transaction includes a little Cash Money. The reason money was provided during the purchase at the check-out counter for that last Christmas purchase is because it is supposed to feel legitimate. Remember that you are not getting your selection of store products for free; if nothing else the partial Cash payment should help the Customer with the thievery feeling.

There is just one more thing for the closing of this last Christmas purchase; that is the Baptism of Jesus. Now I know that the church cares for the religious needs of their church members, but every house can afford to have a Baptism thing for Jesus. So, get out your notebook and make a Baptism certificate for Jesus Christ to keep at home. You already know his information. Have a Good House and Merry Christmas.

Surrealism

Recommended Reading for Salvador Dali
Please refresh this link to book at Amazon.com
Dali by Jose Maria Faerna

Wife to an Elder

How a Wife Shows Deep Respect for Her Husband

In Jesus, Christian wives have a perfect model of submission to authority. What a difference there is between his [Jesus] view of authority and the attitude displayed by the first human wife! Eve failed to provide a good model for wives to follow. She had a divinely commissioned head through whom Jehovah communicated instruction. Yet, Eve did not respect this arrangement. She failed to accept the instruction that Adam conveyed to her. (Gen. 2:16, 17; 3:3; 1 Cor. 11:3) Granted, Eve was deceived; yet she should have consulted her husband as to the propriety of heeding the voice that claimed to tell her what “God knows.” Instead, she presumed to direct her husband. -Gen. 3:5, 6; 1 Tim. 2:14.

Christian Families – Follow Jesus’ Example. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society: New York, July 15 2009.

My first reading of this passage helped me think that Jehovah was confusing. Though Eve didn’t follow her decision or possibly revised her actions, she felt a certainty that Jehovah was satisfied each time she attempted to do his will. This is good that Eve wanted to submit to that authority.

The second reading of this passage was a little harder for me to accept because I thought that Eve never made it to actually connect to Adam. That all she really did was to make a difference for him to be a better man.

My last reading would probably be the one a girl would think. There is an effort on the part of the author to show their relationship was legitimate in the eyes of God on the basis that there was a physical container for which the iterations of Jehovah’s will were to be understood. This must have been confusing for Eve the first human wife. Could you possibly conceive that Jesus instigated that confusion in his time? Jesus might have had that kind of relationship with Jehovah.

Catholic Readings

Mormon Plates

Next Month I will purchase a shovel. Why should I buy a shovel? The Mormon plates are a little bit below my Hobby-Room at home!

Ace Hardware Shovel

First they are buried deep at about six feet. Along my property border, which is a wall, I will have to dig from the neighbors side down and about three feet underneath the slab because the plates are on my property side.

And, after a few discussions and that my Father worked for Trace Manufacturing, a maker of printed circuit boards, and knows a lot about copper, I honestly would like to dig a little. I know that the Mormon plates are mostly made of copper and lead, and that they are rectangular.

Purgatory topic

Catechism [1030-1032, 954-959]

We can die in the love of God but still deserve punishment for our sins just like a person can steal something, be sorry, but still deserve punishment. This punishment we deserve might be called the “stains of sin.” Such stains are cleansed away in a purifying process called purgatory. These stains of sin are primarily the temporal punishment due to venial or mortal sins already forgiven but for which sufficient penance was not done during your lifetime. This doctrine of purgatory, reflected in Scripture and developed in Tradition, was clearly expressed in the Second Council of Lyons (A.D. 1274).

Having passed through purgatory, you will be utterly unselfish, capable of perfect love. Your selfish ego-that part of you that restlessly sought self-satisfaction-will have died forever. The “new you” will be your same inner self, transformed and purified by the intensity of God’s love for you.

Besides declaring the fact of purgatory, the Second Council of Lyons also affirmed that “the faithful on earth can be of great help” to persons undergoing purgatory by offering for them “the sacrifice of the Mass, prayers, almsgiving, and other religious deeds” (63)

A Redemptorist Pastoral Publication. Handbook for Today’s Catholic . 4th ed. Liguori : Liguori Publications, 2004; May 19, 2009.

Continue reading “Purgatory topic” →

Screen yourself

Hugh Farrell is semi-public. I obviously want to promote myself and share my thoughts. Least of all, however public my topics become do I want to inhibit someone from sharing their views. Even if the reader happens to have an opinion after having known me. And so, I want to tell you how sharing my information is best. Screen yourself. Just establish with yourself and others that the ethical issue of Murder is wrong absolutely. Then, and only then will it be possible to carry on about Hugh Farrell.

You will say, “oh hugh, we know this already. God just gets mad.”

You may if you wish visit the Gmen (1935) page. Or, you could accept this as my request. “Hugh Farrell is prepared for screening of this nature.”