Texas Secret A No-Brainer

The no-brainer is that the Getty family is involved and their money was made in Texas oil. It is difficult to have a thought. My grandma was such a great lady and from Texas. I can’t see what this really means. I just need to repeat the facts and let someone else develop the idea who has a better point of view.

Jim Devitt married Arlene Polsen. They had a daughter. Before a year and five months later, when I was born, dad did his bad. He must have had a complication of being related to Rosie for what my mom had in mind. Up until my dad’s bad, my mother must have had a great deal in mind; the suit and prerogative over Getty oil money. After dad’s bad, all that must have been denied.

All this makes me think is that her children must be great people except the father blew it for them. Mark Doolan is exactly like the four daughters’ children – he says that that was his grandfather’s money. The whole lot seems to have been repressed into the sub-conscience. The painting is the only thing that expresses the what that got repressed.

In this post I have tried to express something of great importance, a status of great wealth that belongs to me, only it is such a no-brainer the feeling of wealth evades me. One thing I am sure about, the painting gives me strength as a redeemer to express something that liberates the Getty folly and my father’s bad as they are expressed through me to the outside world. And it is a work of Art. It is not something like a murder or an offence against something or someone; it is a picture. And, it is my turn. I took my turn. I’m glad too.

I just wish I could feel this. It is tremendous.

The Texas Secret

Some of my readers have seen my painting. It is possible that 46605 is an object of special study. That’s okay. I have written about the painting here in my blog myself. There is a post called 48 Fine Art. It tells about the art supplies used for the 46605 work.

Today is mother’s day, and I bring the most compelling news. My father has a secret from his mother Rosie Devitt. She never knew that he offended gas. She always professed that she didn’t know anything about it. But, she believed she was referring to Arlene’s father who was murdered by Francis Beeks when Arlene (my mom) was a teenager. Rosie was really in denial about dad and what he did before I was born. Rosie has passed away since 1995. This family also lost her as a service in 2001. She was born in Pittsburgh Texas. The painting seems to be a worthy notice for her to discover a fact about my dad. It is my note to Grandma Rosie the news of my dad.

I’m only telling you this because the people of Texas have been talking about a secret for a little while, and it is my responsibility to explain. They are saying that JEFF is much more than they realized. Rosie was a woman with a strong mind. She deserves to be in the Art History formula because of what the painting tells her about my dad. She deserves to be in the L.A. culture because she lived in Los Angeles all her life. Writing about Rosie will get the readers in Los Angeles. Basically, I am telling what the secret is. I hope I don’t spoil things for the Texas reader.

Please recall that I have written about J. Paul Getty Jr. in previous posts. He hired Francis to kill my grandfather on my mother’s side because he was molesting his daughters. Arlene is my mother who has three sisters. Francis has passed away recently. The crime was never correctly recorded. I think that the family officially called my grandfather’s death a suicide. I met Mark Doolan the son of J. Paul Getty Jr. who has said that his family deeply regrets the hit. At the time, J. Paul Getty Jr. was living nearby my mom’s childhood home and contracted Francis when Elwood wouldn’t leave the girls alone.

This is supposed to be about Rosie and I have mentioned people on my mother’s side when in fact Rosie was on my father’s side. You should be able to make a build as to how my father could keep a secret from his mom. He would just bring up Arlene. Rosie would have nothing to do with that; and she is in denial about my dad’s gas problem.

Also keep in mind that I would have a great difficulty if 46605 fell into the Getty holdings. It is bad enough that I painted. I learned about my grandfather Elwood Polsen after that. I am doing just fine with everything how it is. The painting is open to the public in Los Angeles. This post is supposed to help the Art Historian develop material on my painting that is accessible. And, I have been telling about what the painting means to Rosie Devitt in the mind. And so, I want to wish everyone a Happy Mother’s Day!

Comment March 18th, 2018. This is a lot of drama about the car. I just need to note here that the car was dismantled and engine melted down. It felt like I fell into a pit right when I was having tea. So, I’m calling it my Tea Scenario.

Life World

I want to thank everyone for all the praise I have received about 46605. I have painted a work of Art that is exceptional. It is the most beautiful picture in existence. I lived with it and a T.V. I would rather gaze at the painting than watch T.V. There is so much to see. It truly is a wonderful gift I have given the world. I am happy that it is available, finely, for people to see. And, I appreciate the praise from people who have seen 46605.

Thank you very much.

Citation for the Painting

When John Hostler wrote his book, my number 46605 became a possible area for a work of Art. The number might not have had any history as an area prior to that. But, I suspect the number 46605 does have more history than that; perhaps even prior to the invention of the Decimal.

I have not said this before, that the number is the dimensions of the painting in inches because I thought it was a no brainer. I thought of no other interesting composition content for a large painting than it’s dimensions.

I purchased the canvas from a sail maker in Santa Cruz. After calculating some possible dimensions, I picked 46×60.5 because the number looked pleasing and sounded nice. Looking at the back of the work, there is more canvas pulled around the stretcher bars in one dimension indicating that the canvas might be for a size taller than forty-six inches. I used that extra canvas on the back of the painting for my signature: Jeff Devitt UCSC instructor Kacy Kladget.

I was taking a rigorous Philosophy sequence of classes that year, and UC Santa Cruz had John Hostler’s book at the college library. I did not see it, however, until after I painted.

If it is any interest to the reader, there were some studies, one in particular that was used for the painting; but, those studies were thrown away by my father. I looked for them in 1993 among my portfolio stuff and they were missing.

In prior posts I’ve mentioned the art supplies. Try the 46605 link at the bottom of this post if the reader is only interested in the painting.

IF Comment

This Painting is painted from skills acquired while a student at the University of California at Santa Cruz under the instructor Kacy Kladget. It should be considered a supplement to the work 46605 at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art by Jeffrey Devitt. In 46605 there is a set of axis in three dimensions. The reason I painted this painting is that the axis needs to be ordered. Thus I have painted a 5 to illustrate the way in which the axis is to be ordered; the right hand rule.

It is an original Jeffrey Devitt although it is not signed, and not framed. I am giving the work to my Aunt. The expectation is that the museum will want to see it, however I am so limited that it would be impossible unless she makes an arrangement.

Last Word On Conscience

I wrote that I’m loosing my girlfriends due to a function of the work of Art titled 46605 in an earlier post – differentiation; but, now in this last two posts I wrote about differentiation of the conscience. I know I’m not getting anywhere with it. I’m a primary quality whose mental illness manifests in an understandable way. I just wanted to acknowledge the differentiation function in terms other than what a girl’s natural process has within. The truth that it is no big deal is perhaps better understood by young people who wouldn’t appreciate my painting’s nature.

Posts in this reading cell:

About The Conscience

I have written about differentiation, however the reader would have had to have read some of my earlier posts to know I have already said some stuff on the conscience. Well, I will mention it again. This post is on differentiating the conscience.

The twenty-second chromosome exists in a dominant and recessive trait. The people with more interaction with the world, have more information to process, or feel strongly about a certain idea have a dominant trait for the twenty-second chromosome.

The reason this gene is responsible for our conscience is because it is possible for a person to inherit a dominant gene from both parents. It causes a genetic disorder known as phocomelia. The dominant-dominant disposition is very assertive. It is like the parent’s consciences together in one body. As you can see I’ve been begotten. But, this genetic disorder fuels the differentiation process. We think stuff about our selves because we also have the same twenty-second chromosome and are affected by the person with phocomelia.

People with a recessive disposition for the twenty-second chromosome also work correctly. They trust their own feelings and make decisions from within. They’re a free spirit.

It is common to have one dominant gene and one recessive gene – one from each parent. It is also common to inherit two recessive genes. The phocomelia is not common. Out of the rare occasions when the dominant-dominant disposition survives the assertiveness in one body of the parent’s consciences, the offspring has the blood-type AB.

So, some things fall into place. It is conceivable for this text to explain mental illness. A person could suffer indirectly from phocomelia more particularly than normal. It also depends on the kind of mental illness depending on their particular dispositions of the same twenty-second chromosome.

Now I have said my peace as to the conscience and differentiation.

Betty’s Paint Box

I’ve marked 48 Fine Art public. If it has to have a date, it would be – March 18, 2018. I’ve marked The Painting of Betty’s Paint Box featuring some white canvas public. That date is December 31, 2021; when Betty White died at age 99. Why Betty White? October 19, 1991.

This is the Getty / Betty post.

Betty was Grandma Kay’s sister, I named Kay’s Paint Box, “Betty.” Betty lived out in the desert and it was thought that Kay would accept her Paint Box. I now believe that the Paint Box came from a Getty Staff person. That’s right, it was a designed paint box for the knowledge about Elwood and J. Paul Getty Jr. Isn’t that a delusion? Betty’s Paint Box was designed by someone who knew about J Paul Getty Jr’s contract and planted the Paint Box at Grandma Kay’s house.

J Paul Getty Jr. post for who Elwood is. Kay was Elwood’s wife. She gave me the paint box to use at UC Santa Cruz. She said to me, “the problem is in here,” I took the paint box with me when I went to Art School. I painted 46605 with those ART supplies. After that there was nothing left. The supplies were old oils. I got the painting 46605 from that paint box.

The only way I know that we got something from the Getty is by the name I have given to the Paint Box; Betty.

Are you interested in the Murder story? See the movie, The Titanic where there is an implicit discussion. Francis Beeks died in 2010. Have Betty promise us 46605 will never fall into the Getty holdings.

Differentiation

I’m losing my girlfriends due to artistic differentiation. Look at this image. It is a derivative of the 46605 composition. How am I losing my girlfriends? They are having sex; just with other men. They are not technically cheating. They are just choosing someone else out of the ART’s Nature. Another man is easier.Now my mind is musing that a relationship could yield great beauty sexually if only I had a chance. The reality though is that I’ve been cheated on too much. It would be easy for a girlfriend to cheat due to my losses thus far.

The main idea on beauty to me means a committed girlfriend that wants to cultivate a mutually loving relationship. I know this sounds traditional. A good girl could resist these iterations of differentiation as they occur. Take the example of the driver’s license. Does your card read CALIFORNIA across the top and a white tinted circle where the details of name are printed? Is that not the same as the derivative shown above? A good girl should not give out just because someone can corroborate her DMV information. A Loving relationship should develop with better criteria. I am sure I can create that something better.

Art History Issue

There is an edit to the Art and Artist post. See: Art and Artist. I have located the psychologist that is determined to find the 46605 Art-work a permanent home.

I have a presentation to mail to the museum. It is not on the topic of art. I have to locate the essay and then edit it. I will mail it to the museum as soon as it is ready. Please have patience.

Comment: March 13, 2010; I am going to send insurance money for the painting. A directive is developing in which the painting might need to be registered with a gallery in Russia. I listened to the Metropolitan Opera show today. The title for the opera is The Nose, a Russian story of the painting’s number. Recall that the painting is itself.

Thank you.