I am quite well versed in this subject as it was an emphasis for me in school. There are many categories of which this is a parent.
A girl has this as the first directive for a guy. It’s the Age old question. There are a number of responses to this kind of a “Fire-Wall.” ART is the closest and best answer, but there are as many developments to this first directive as there are relationships. Continue reading “Make Me A Picture!”
There is some question as to just what is the XVR page. Some visitors are wondering about the situation. I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral. So, let us take a survey of the situation.
First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed. That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications. Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature. That should be a Huzza for Hume!!
Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty. And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being. Familiar? Yes. Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology. At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine. I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY. So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion. And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome. A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.
From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character. I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy. I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time. He refused his award. I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance. Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne. And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious. Is it a “Pay Stub?”
The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers. I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone. I am not going to worry about it. I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.
Psalms 115 is pretty good. Picture, Pay Stub, Shower, Parking-lot, Accommodation.
Now that I have identified a possible fix, I want to just mention that it might be a fix for the Proverbs 6.
Comment: January 9, 2026: On December 28, 2025 I was moved from Proverbs to the Gospel of Mark.
I wish I could be a better friend. I was a whore. This is the latest “What’s That?” It was Proverbs.
The opportunity in Architecture requires a Fire-wall configuration. If I did not get that opportunity to say No, my position would be something closer to actually doing Architecture instead of the iteration “No.” I know what No is. No, is always No. But if someone were calling the Architecture issue a No is just that. I might be compelled to go into Architecture on the basis that this configuration is already in place about me. So, let’s get started.
I know right away that a Pencil is a major problem. If in the early stages I cannot manage this particular issue I will try something else.
I should let you know my thinking up to this point. (1) Bricks become a legend. The bottom of the Drafting page is made up of proportionate boxes 2 in. x 3/4 in. This is the big conclusion for the study on Bricks. (2) “EVER-READY” becomes “Look for Beauty.” This one I am a little upset about. This will probably be a reason many mature Architects build places with Windows (not a computer term). If you are concerned about this issue I have more to say. It has to do with appropriately populating; a social issue.
Now, I better stop because I’ve opened too many things. Just keep in mind that people go out of their way and so an underlying principle is understood as long as everyone is on the same page.
The “exciting” Time of year in Religion is probably Christmas; it is the coming of the baby Jesus. The Spring time is a close second with the Resurrection of Jesus on Easter Sunday. I want to mention a couple of things I am thinking concerning Jesus. As with many Religions our instincts reaffirm Religious practice as good. The Truth is that Religion is a living system of our Society which has served people well for a while. Two compelling insights for today are: Jesus was very involved in the drama of the Time. He was a player. His feelings were identifiable. In his teachings, he spoke of his conscience which people understood. Now the proof of this is that Jesus Saved. He saved us Sinners with his Crucifixtion and Death. I know this must sound confusing, but today Jesus would probably have participated in the discussion about which some people get and some do not.
The second issue I want to mention and I’ve already stated that this post is confusing, Jesus was the Son of God. He was made into a man from God’s image. There was something which would not pass. And in the creation of Jesus that issue was reconciled and made into a Religion. We follow the Words of Jesus fully knowing that from the necessity of embodiment, an acknowledgment of earthly substance, there is certain criteria of the conscience that will not rationalize into a stable practice. It is just too stormy. I could be talking about feelings generally. And, I could be talking about family as a unit. And there are many instances of the disposition from which I am referring. There are probably a number of people throughout Time who have mused about this notion, and who have come to be associated in controversy similarity; Residential Sages if you will. The main point, without getting too abstract, is to just notice that the Jesus phenomena was correct for his Time and that at the very least we have an ordinary way to manage our feelings; but also that his circumstance is recognizable and though interesting would not weaken a person’s Religion. Religious practice is good. It’s okay to wonder about Jesus. Many people as have I, we muse about Jesus. I am as excited about Jesus today as I was when I first learned about his exciting news.
So, now I want to take care of some of the details. Since we want to discover Religion in today’s terms let us beg the question of our faith, something we would do naturally but don’t out of fear we would cancel something. Was Jesus a good story? Then wouldn’t we say yes to another comming? Sure why-not; It’s Christmas!! So, now let there be a person like Jesus. We will say that Adoption is too far. The acceptable term would be Foster.
But, today we have many more features in our society than that of his time. We would attest that Jesus, in an attempt to “Foster” that kind of a personality, will probably learn the facts of his circumstance from other branches of society. The person like Jesus would learn about his circumstance one way or another. The effort would be spoiled simply by knowledge yeilded from our complex society. This is one of the basic messages in the L.M. Boston’s Young Adult Book series. For today it is just enough to understand a little bit about Jesus and his circumstance. It was a correct reading just to sort of realize Jesus is a nice way of socializing or an essential Family Unit. Don’t get discouraged. The mystery has a Faith. Grow and learn as much as you like. Your Faith will not fail; it will only become stronger. And your knowledge better.
No doubt there are people who impose a system of equivalencies on another person. For this educator type person there are these sort of boundaries. Let me explain.
From the type of person who uses their internal strife, they partition time into segments. Contrary to contiguity, they benefit someone who is outside by imposing on them their equivalency.
Traditionally taught, the way in which our thoughts vary for different people, these rather precious moments, expressed as Seize the Day, are that of the Sophist and should be free. It is education.
What I need to mention is that this type of person is that way in accordance with the internal laws of the Oxygen Atom!
Lilies of the Field is currently my very top movie these days. From it I would proceed to a subaltern movie. I will be inclined to return the idea of Lilies of the Field because it brings up the Famous Philosopher Berkeley. I guess I’m hooked on Lilies because I think that Berkeley has a Chapel in mind from his childhood. With that as one of the issues for Berkeley, it would have influenced his later works of Philosophy.
The dialog is pretty tight as well. I think that Lilies is worthy of Auto-Play. Not only does this movie parse correctly for this Time, it’s many chords manages to take care of me!
See you at the movies!
It is no longer available on the internet, but I just wanted to mention the “Acoustic Exchange.” It might be relevant here.
Prohibition began on January 16, 1920. This Posting will explain that the Post Office did indeed have some interesting packages during prohibition.
Interestingly during prohibition, Wineries continued making wine with creative wine making practices. One acceptable method of wine making was in conjunction with Church.
The Catholic Church needed Wine for the Religious activity of Communion. Beaulieu Vineyard, was popular; they claimed they were, “The House of Alter Wine.” The other way in which a winery could stay in business during prohibition was supporting wine making practices for people at home.
The deal was to mail the home wine maker a kit containing the materials to make the wine. Under a loophole in The Volstead Act, the head of house hold could make up to two hundred gallons of wine a year. So, Wineries would mail grape juice and concentrate under names like Forbidden Fruit, Vine-Glo and Moonmist to homes via the Post Office.
Now this would be taking place in 1915. Wine making technology was not very sophisticated. The instructions sometimes would read as a warning, “Do not place container in room temperature over 60 degrees or contents may ferment.” It is important to realize the types of grapes were used had to be hardy since the shipping was often across country. Today wines are made with grapes grown for their subtle or complex quality of wine on the palate. Alicante Bouschet and Alicante Ganzin were thus used back then but were considered bad at the very least. I imagine that they were very much like the Concord Grape used today in grape juice Concentrate.
As part of the wine making practices during prohibition the juice or grapes were shipped in the mail. This would probably mean complications during shipping. Some leakage and even soaked cardboard was an ordinary appearance at the Post Office. So this stuff was shipping; and so in time, also dried if spilled or broken. Oh how the Post Office must have hated the mail articles containing whine. Well, I have always been a little afraid of smells. But I think I know the smell they had when a household ordered a wine making kit.
Some Pretty major changes took place in the Napa Valley after prohibition which wouldn’t have been due to the pressures of the Post Office. It makes sense the wineries could use delicate grapes and thus a more complex wine on location after prohibition. However the Post Office didn’t complain or cause the political tides ending prohibition; that was because of the voters who wanted to drink.
And, so the interesting era ended after fourteen years where the Post Office managed things on the basis of an occasional smell. The ending of prohibition meant that wine could be shipped more appropriately. If even the occasional bottle were to leak or break the product could never have such a devastating affect as a distinctive smell since the quality of the product is much improved. There is a natural inclination for improvements yet this is probably one practice which goes into history as interesting for the Post Office and did not have any negative effect.
You already have seen this picture in Apply Frank
I am going to discuss my personal views about someone who is very important to me; Merleau-Ponty. From my first recollection, I did not like Ponty. The fact is those feelings guaranteed me an automatic ‘F’. I can tell that I have made progress in my opinion since – as evidence by my erasure of comments in the margins of his greatest work: Eye and Mind.
So I cleaned up my copy of his essay. Merleau-Ponty who was a French Philosopher wrote about the Master French painter Cezanne. After Ponty passed away in the early sixties, his works were translated into English. The translator, Carleton Dallery used a number of writing styles to achieve an effective and purposeful study for the English speaking scholar to learn about Cezanne. The consequences for my strong feelings against Merleau-Ponty at that first reading are not outside of the realm of possibilities for any reader. It might be the case that Carleton Dallery at the expense of being perceived as not knowing a certain detail about Cezanne, embedded a critical idea which does not come to fruition in order to affect the reader with strong feelings. Not however, but particularly for Ponty, space has taken on a kind of identity. I have had difficulty overcoming my initial opinion and further hold by some fault of my own I have come up short on wits. Thus I must reason I had at that time the condition about which I have already talked about a necessity for agreement. This is in keeping with my latter readings, and I want to reassure Dick Tracy that I like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and that I understand his essay; I admit it is a great work.
You are a fool! So, you say you like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, but you have changed. Why you don’t convict him for your disposition?
Well, I will tell you, my friend, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s English translation has as a remedy something called a Rhinoplasty. This is a Plastic Surgery correcting the Septum from deviation. These were his last words, ‘you have your whole life ahead of you.’ I got a Rhinoplasty. It has been the single most enlightening procedure of my Life.
If you are able to sustain a frame of mind on that of a person whose fingers are stubby, you will learn. There are a number of builds that are available to muse with; all of which raises your social status. I am telling you this because there is a reason that a Dominant Gene results in a Conscience. The Dominant Genes of this particular type in a person who has one from each parent, results in a disorder, called Phocomelia, and which causes a birth defect of the arms and hands. Phocomelia literally means Flippers. The genetic disposition, I am calling a Disorder, includes the making of the Conscience where there is only one Dominant Gene of which it is the same type. Here the Idea is that you get your genes from your parents. This is a normal condition to have one, or to have both Recessive. The infamous Luke Sky-walker was Recessive-Recessive; “Use the Force Luke”. And this very issue which sadly Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not correctly develop for some reason, is a Distinguishing component of socialization.
When the Philosopher says existentially NO!; it is to be a distinguishing threshold in which we enlightened the path to Fame. For example you would not want a person with a conscience to read the news or write lyrics for an album unless the person were able to overcome the present with new material. What you have said about my acceptance of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is probably a thought disorder.
To make this situation which I have built in thought whole, I just want to mention that there is another reading of David Hume. His thoughts mostly have been about the good of determination. But if you needed an advocate for your applied distinguishing activity, which I have said is Genetic, Hume has the correct thinking for a free minded person of a general nature to be an advocate. So, on the basis that this issue is Genetic, I conclude that there will be NO changes in the thinking process – no fear. I say this and I expect you to believe that you are who you are ever since conception. Now, haven’t I been a nuisance, a person should not have Fear? And haven’t I just given you a good reason to teach Hume even though his works only seem to fit with a certain type of a person?
If for some reason, the little friendship that Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre had while the editors of the magazine in France the prejudice against Maurice Merleau-Ponty still went without address, his reason is there really is something to see: and I am referring to Phenomenology. Maurice Merleau-Ponty would have been the president of that little organization of Cosmonauts.
Now, I have a little bit of house keeping to do for Maurice Merleau-Ponty that I haven’t addressed elsewhere. While Maurice Merleau-Ponty had a driver which never came to fruition. I have mentioned it earlier, there is a confusion about which gene he is referring to. Let me say that when I was referring to a Dominant Gene, it is conceivable the inherited dominant gene for conscience could have come from either parent and not just the Father. Though he did not speak of it, he was all the while referring to another Gene; it was a driver to get a person to have strong feelings. In the Philosophical work Eye and Mind, which he is best known for and which he sort of built a little engine “see,” Maurice Merleau-Ponty, though I do not believe it today, there is a tendency to confuse the gene for sex with the gene for conscience. Recall that Maurice Merleau-Ponty mostly ignored the prompting from Sartre about the Genetic issue. So, when the prejudicial perspective that Sartre would have prompted him about in their years together came up, Maurice Merleau-Ponty probably extended his most highest held belief, to see, in the instance that it is restricted to that of the spirit of the Father. In the case of the Fathers Gene, the Genetic issue is in regards to the twenty-third Chromosome determining a person’s sex. In a remedy, from the religious point of view involving the Holy Trinity, after thoughts (God willing), the Father could have a high degree of influence over his children’s cognitive abilities. Here I want to mention that this is as much a disparity as that of the twenty-second Chromosome which determines conscience. So, even though I have been square about a Distinguishing social issue, the presiding gene, I have had to bring into the discussion a matter of articulation of Maurice Merleau-Pontys emphasis as having a gene that could inconceivably been inherited from the Mother as well as from the Father. It is the Holy Trinity case the Philosopher Spinoza had as a good Catholic. Maurice Merleau-Ponty merely cast into time for a collection of intelligent substance with which seeing would be the basis of a Phenomenology without the context involving the gene for sexual orientation.
I seem to have uncovered a matter of confusion. If you wish to think about this issue look at XVR and Comments to XVR
10 PERCENT 