Critique of Kant

I thought that Kant’s Categorical Imperative explains what has been going on with me. Especially since Leila passed away in 2018. I was her associated person. I think that made me susceptible to Kant’s Philosophy.

Now I have a problem because it doesn’t account for the person that’s a “no” from the get go. So, I looked into Kant’s critics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_the_Kantian_Philosophy

Paul Guyer

In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer (1999), the philosopher Paul Guyer wrote an article titled “Schopenhauer, Kant, and the Methods of Philosophy.” It was suggested that I try to get the person’s consent.

This is the Wikipedia page for Arthur Schopenhauer’s main work. It’s two volumes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_as_Will_and_Representation

Devitt with a Girlfriend

I gave a girl access to my family. I gave her a Picture Postcard of a Lotus flower for Beauty, Strength, and Purity. It was from me. It was a firewall. I gave her access because my name explains how she is doing emotionally.

On May 17, 2025, she gave us a group where she told me and my family no. She didn’t like my name. She listed Safe/Unsafe feelings; see the AI word Doc. She told my whole family no. She has the right to say no. But, privacy rules applied she probably can’t give out my name to others. I want to write to my family about what happened in that group. She clearly said no to us. I recognized that. This is not one of those times a person needs to realize Pi. I was careful to make sure Pi was available for the name.

For my family, Pi is necessary. I know something about it. She is experiencing Pi. I need to tell her to try and do something with Pi; go to Seattle.

An engagement is a social process. I appreciated her directly telling me no. She broke our engagement honestly. I respect that. I am going forward with healthy boundaries.