Rhinoplasty

It is hard to come to this, but I have realized that there are people who would appreciate very much my talking about the Rhinoplasty. I got one in 1991. I was twenty-three. Basically since childhood I had had a deviated septum. So, when I got punched in the nose at a concert and needed an ENT to work on my nose in 1991, I was told the septum could be corrected as well.

This is a long awaited list for remedies to manage Schizophrenia.

1. Daniel is the ontological mainstay for Cezanne. Cezanne learned about his illness from the bible book of Daniel.

2. Let’s say Daniel is a name. Cezanne thought things through to the people who didn’t have Schizophrenia; they should change their names to avoid the controversy about their name.

3. The person with Schizophrenia should try going to the correct community about which Schizophrenia is discussed: for various reasons that’s Ventura County.

4. Since mostly having knowledge about the body, a person who suffers might look at heart disease. This is a good subject because the person is gentler then most other people; if not as a young person hopefully by later years.

5. Consider Privacy as a worthy subject of study for the individual who suffers the disease.

6. By request, the burns on a person might also help someone if even just a short reprieve.

Fashion Type for Me

Comments to XVR

There is some question as to just what is the XVR page. Some visitors are wondering about the situation. I read the page today and I think that there is a lot of evidence presented, and that the reader is expected to make an integral. So, let us take a survey of the situation.

First, the distinguishing definition that prefaces the comparison of Sartre and Ponty could also refer to one of the governing rights, though on it’s way out, a Creed. That issue is coming to a realization by both global warming and government complications. Keep in mind that though it seems like I have spelled things out, that it is really a difficult exercise to realize that Hume has his value in support for people who would be recessively oriented rather than dominant in nature. That should be a Huzza for Hume!!

Okay, now that the genetic issue is being discussed, I bring to the discussion differentiation of Sartre and Ponty. And, from that passage in XVR the intended message is that Ponty’s little engine “see” is designed to see only those indiscernible objects which will never fully come into being. Familiar? Yes. Ponty was developing for only the most treasured events of Phenomenology. At the time of writing XVR I realized that Ponty was not clear about what relative “see” it is that was supposed to satisfy his engine. I reasoned, thankfully that see would not hurt me, the genetic issue made most sense when I imagined he was referring to the twenty-third chromosome; inheritance of Sexual orientation; XY. So the reader has to read for the distinction of the Sartre and Ponty discussion. And most notably that Ponty may have been attracted to another gene on the basis that it was controversial; the twenty-second chromosome. A tall order for a philosopher whose best work is less than fifty pages.

From another direction, Sartre was a major person in the self actualization for people to sort of understand their seeing character. I am really not very well learned about Sartre’s philosophy. I do know that he must have been very patient with Ponty and served in the clutch for most of the time. He refused his award. I am sure he will eventually resolve his need to get that interesting psychology term for the seeing person involved in the Ponty circumstance. Recall that Ponty was writing about Paul Cezanne. And since the situation was that of the naturally recessing genetic disposition, Sartre remains naturally curious. Is it a “Pay Stub?”

The question remains in the XVR page how does any of this relate to the X or the R when the passage doesn’t ever mention the basic facts that are predicating the philosophers. I hope at the outside there is a suspicion that XVR is a correct title by intuition alone. I am not going to worry about it. I feel that there is enough said without having doubt about the way in which a decision such as XVR is decided.

Phenomenology

I am going to discuss my personal views about someone who is very important to me; Merleau-Ponty. From my first recollection, I did not like Ponty. The fact is those feelings guaranteed me an automatic ‘F’. I can tell that I have made progress in my opinion since – as evidence by my erasure of comments in the margins of his greatest work: Eye and Mind.

So I cleaned up my copy of his essay. Merleau-Ponty who was a French Philosopher wrote about the Master French painter Cezanne. After Ponty passed away in the early sixties, his works were translated into English. The translator, Carleton Dallery used a number of writing styles to achieve an effective and purposeful study for the English speaking scholar to learn about Cezanne. The consequences for my strong feelings against Merleau-Ponty at that first reading are not outside of the realm of possibilities for any reader. It might be the case that Carleton Dallery at the expense of being perceived as not knowing a certain detail about Cezanne, embedded a critical idea which does not come to fruition in order to affect the reader with strong feelings. Not however, but particularly for Ponty, space has taken on a kind of identity. I have had difficulty overcoming my initial opinion and further hold by some fault of my own I have come up short on wits. Thus I must reason I had at that time the condition about which I have already talked about a necessity for agreement. This is in keeping with my latter readings, and I want to reassure Dick Tracy that I like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and that I understand his essay; I admit it is a great work.

You are a fool! So, you say you like Maurice Merleau-Ponty, but you have changed. Why you don’t convict him for your disposition?

Well, I will tell you, my friend, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s English translation has as a remedy something called a Rhinoplasty. This is a Plastic Surgery correcting the Septum from deviation. These were his last words, ‘you have your whole life ahead of you.’ I got a Rhinoplasty. It has been the single most enlightening procedure of my Life.

If you are able to sustain a frame of mind on that of a person whose fingers are stubby, you will learn. There are a number of builds that are available to muse with; all of which raises your social status. I am telling you this because there is a reason that a Dominant Gene results in a Conscience. The Dominant Genes of this particular type in a person who has one from each parent, results in a disorder, called Phocomelia, and which causes a birth defect of the arms and hands. Phocomelia literally means Flippers. The genetic disposition, I am calling a Disorder, includes the making of the Conscience where there is only one Dominant Gene of which it is the same type. Here the Idea is that you get your genes from your parents. This is a normal condition to have one, or to have both Recessive. The infamous Luke Sky-walker was Recessive-Recessive; “Use the Force Luke”. And this very issue which sadly Maurice Merleau-Ponty did not correctly develop for some reason, is a Distinguishing component of socialization.

When the Philosopher says existentially NO!; it is to be a distinguishing threshold in which we enlightened the path to Fame. For example you would not want a person with a conscience to read the news or write lyrics for an album unless the person were able to overcome the present with new material. What you have said about my acceptance of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is probably a thought disorder.

To make this situation which I have built in thought whole, I just want to mention that there is another reading of David Hume. His thoughts mostly have been about the good of determination. But if you needed an advocate for your applied distinguishing activity, which I have said is Genetic, Hume has the correct thinking for a free minded person of a general nature to be an advocate. So, on the basis that this issue is Genetic, I conclude that there will be NO changes in the thinking process – no fear. I say this and I expect you to believe that you are who you are ever since conception. Now, haven’t I been a nuisance, a person should not have Fear? And haven’t I just given you a good reason to teach Hume even though his works only seem to fit with a certain type of a person?

If for some reason, the little friendship that Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre had while the editors of the magazine in France the prejudice against Maurice Merleau-Ponty still went without address, his reason is there really is something to see: and I am referring to Phenomenology. Maurice Merleau-Ponty would have been the president of that little organization of Cosmonauts.

Now, I have a little bit of house keeping to do for Maurice Merleau-Ponty that I haven’t addressed elsewhere. While Maurice Merleau-Ponty had a driver which never came to fruition. I have mentioned it earlier, there is a confusion about which gene he is referring to. Let me say that when I was referring to a Dominant Gene, it is conceivable the inherited dominant gene for conscience could have come from either parent and not just the Father. Though he did not speak of it, he was all the while referring to another Gene; it was a driver to get a person to have strong feelings. In the Philosophical work Eye and Mind, which he is best known for and which he sort of built a little engine “see,” Maurice Merleau-Ponty, though I do not believe it today, there is a tendency to confuse the gene for sex with the gene for conscience. Recall that Maurice Merleau-Ponty mostly ignored the prompting from Sartre about the Genetic issue. So, when the prejudicial perspective that Sartre would have prompted him about in their years together came up, Maurice Merleau-Ponty probably extended his most highest held belief, to see, in the instance that it is restricted to that of the spirit of the Father. In the case of the Fathers Gene, the Genetic issue is in regards to the twenty-third Chromosome determining a person’s sex. In a remedy, from the religious point of view involving the Holy Trinity, after thoughts (God willing), the Father could have a high degree of influence over his children’s cognitive abilities. Here I want to mention that this is as much a disparity as that of the twenty-second Chromosome which determines conscience. So, even though I have been square about a Distinguishing social issue, the presiding gene, I have had to bring into the discussion a matter of articulation of Maurice Merleau-Pontys emphasis as having a gene that could inconceivably been inherited from the Mother as well as from the Father. It is the Holy Trinity case the Philosopher Spinoza had as a good Catholic. Maurice Merleau-Ponty merely cast into time for a collection of intelligent substance with which seeing would be the basis of a Phenomenology without the context involving the gene for sexual orientation.

I seem to have uncovered a matter of confusion. If you wish to think about this issue look at XVR and Comments to XVR

Part II Deserved Attention

You know it is an effort to think rationally; but on making the thoughts on purpose is usually a little bit out of the way since really all we can expect is the possibility. So, I want to focus on a thought. How did you get that thought? Was it a thought from just before? And here it is; and, I realize that just because you made a change of focus and I’m alone and possibly in a different place I need a little context. You have changed you perspective and it makes sense to me. Oh how troubling is this given that I’m an easy mover. I guess the best way to explain is by calling it a fortress. So you know what? I don’t really care if my stability is a variance. You especially should not worry about me they are your thoughts. All I can expect is that you are rational. As we will discover by the end of this posting it will literally be about you! But now, I’ve assured people enough, and now from a management perspective I look like a risk of safety. I have given trials and tribulations; I have learned to trust my inner voice and most about my self governance I have learned to trust my feelings; about ideas I am responsible. All of this just to keep my place in line. So, there is really no surprise that I have deserved, by reassurance to those people who could apply a therapeutic outcome for me, to in fact cause me to have a therapeutic outcome.

I have the responsibility to a smaller degree that if even my father has decided that I am his rotten son, I have the honor of enjoying the benefits of a relationship with him, about which he has no idea. For my dad; there is no hiding places. Or if there is a hiding place, it is everywhere. So my thinking which you might say is your thinking, is the arrangement agreeably rational. The candid relationship with my father is a benefit requiring responsibility. I have re-assured people a lot; I have proved my place in my community even if I discern my adversaries. If you haven’t noticed I get practically every social disease imaginable; and , before that I was waking enough in a consistent sort of way to have gotten all my curtain calls. By about this time there is another level about to be exposed.

Cognitive Thinking

Spinoza:
This is the absolute end of Philosophy.

There is a phase issue for people who need an outcome which will improve their thinking. Yes Mental Health works pretty good. A person, for example, could be an inpatient. They’re progress would be monitored by a record every fifteen minutes.

Lanterman-Petris-Short Act; 1967

Prior to the major cognitive improvement there would be signs of stress in regards to Spinoza. This recording has a place for a person who could not get a way of knowing as to how to proceed from any other way. Do we say the person jumped? What is in the making or how does one get the consent to proceed? These things I am not certain of. When I discover the resource, I will put it here. Under normal circumstances there is never any discovery, divorce or improvements. People just have the evidence that they are going along in a good way. I am one of the ones who looks like I am not working correctly; but when a person inquires as is the convention in considerations of ownership, they mostly find out that I am working correctly; that I have Cognitive thought. This is something I did not always have. My Spinoza never has a chance to get very big because when there is a change I comply with the change and so Spinoza always has the context instantly for me when I am anew. I just don’t have a crisis and nowhere to proceed to because there is a possibility. All I am saying is that some people have to get this artificially. I did. I like the fact that I have had a therapeutic outcome. It has been a Major Improvement.

Comment: Gevluef, March 25, 2016; The case in which Spinoza indemnifies the cognitive circumstance, it should be noted that either because the possibility is too difficult, or just that the possibility is someone else’s there is a Cognitive Imbalance in which the situation requires the condition of SORRY.